Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 6;25(16):3572. doi: 10.3390/molecules25163572

Table 1.

Bionanocomposite samples’ codes, compositions, and various tests performed in the study.

Sample Code Sample Composition Test Performed
A1 PEEK/HA (20 wt%)/CNT (0.5 wt%), porosity 75% ALP, Mechanical
A2 PEEK/HA (20 wt%)/CNT (1.0 wt%), porosity 75% ALP, Mechanical, Cell viability
A3 PEEK/HA (20 wt%)/CNTs (2 wt%), porosity 75% Cell viability, Mechanical
A4 PEEK/HA (20 wt%)/CF (0.5 wt%), porosity 75% ALP, Mechanical
A5 PEEK/HA (20 wt%)/CF (1.0 wt%), porosity 75% ALP, Mechanical, Cell viability
A6 PEEK/HA (20 wt%) /CF (2 wt%), porosity 75% Mechanical
A7 PEEK only, porosity 75% ALP, Mechanical, cell viability,
A8 PEEK/HA (10 wt%), porosity 75% Cell viability
A9 PEEK/HA (15 wt%), porosity 75% Cell viability
A10 PEEK/HA (20 wt%), porosity 75% Cell viability, Mechanical
B1 PEEK/HA (20 wt%)/CNTs (0.5 wt%), porosity 85% Cell viability, Mechanical
B2 PEEK/HA (20 wt%)/CNTs (1 wt%), porosity 85% Cell viability, Mechanical
B3 PEEK/HA (20 wt%)/CNTs (2 wt%), porosity 85% cell viability, Mechanical
B4 PEEK/HA (20 wt%)/CF (0.5 wt%), porosity 85% Mechanical
B5 PEEK/HA (20 wt%)/CF (1 wt%), porosity 85% Cell viability, Mechanical
B6 PEEK/HA (20 wt%)/CF (2 wt%), porosity 85% Mechanical
B7 PEEK only, porosity 85% Cell viability