Table 1.
Authors Year [Reference] | Ti Component/Surface Texture/Implant company | Contamination Method | Number of Specimens Per Group (Total) | CAP Device | CAP Settings: Time (s) Mean Power (W) Gas Distance (D) | Decontamination Methods | Settings for other Methods | Outcome Measured | Overall Conclusions |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rupf et al. 2011 [32] |
|
Oral biofilm formed in situ by fixing Ti at the buccal site of molar and premolar teeth for 24 h or 72 h | 149:24 h 149:72 h 36: no biofilm (334) | Custom built (Leibniz Institute of Surface Modification, Germany) |
|
|
|
|
CAP caused inactivation of bacteria biofilm and significant reduction of protein amounts. For complete elimination, additional application and second series of CAP was necessary |
Coelho et al. 2012 [46] |
|
No contamination | 24 implants | kiNPen (INP, Greifswald, Germany) |
|
n/a | n/a |
|
CAP fostered higher levels of contact with surrounding tissues, promoting more rapid ad higher quantity of bone around rough Ti surfaces |
Duske et al. 2012 [7] |
|
No contamination | 10 discs per group (360) | Plasma jet (INP, Greifswald, Germany) |
|
|
n/a |
|
CAP reduced contact angle and supports spreading of MG-63 cells |
Canullo et al.2013 [42] |
|
n/a | 30 per group (60) | Plasma Reactor (Colibri, Gambetti Company) |
|
Untreated | n/a | L 929 viability, adhesion, morphology | CAP treatment could be used for abutment cleansing to favor peri-implant tissue healing |
Giro et al. 2013 [49] |
|
No contamination | 24 implants | kiNPen (INP, Greifswald, Germany) |
|
n/a | n/a |
|
Higher degrees of surface wettability resulted in significantly higher BIC and BAFO following CaP-CAP |
Idlibi et al. 2013 [18] |
|
Oral biofilm formed in situ at the buccal site of molar and premolar teeth for 72h | 20 in each group (200) | Custom built (Leibniz Institute of Surface Modification, Leipzig, Germany) | CAP 1:
|
1. Untreated control; 2. Gas; 3. DL; 4. AA; 5a and 5b. CHX | 2.
|
|
CAP significantly reduced the viability and quantity of biofilm, although complete removal was not achieved. Its efficacy correlated with the treatment duration and CAP power |
Danna et al. 2015 [47] |
|
No contamination | 56 implants | kiNPen (INP, Greifswald, Germany) |
|
n/a | n/a |
|
CAP-treated Ti and CaP implants showed decreased levels of C and increased levels of Ti and O, Ca and O. No significant differences for BAFO. Significant increase in BIC for CAP-treated Ti implants, not for CaP surfaces |
Duske et al. 2015 [48] |
|
Biofilm formed in vitro from subgingival plaque | 10 discs per group | kINPen08, INP Greifswald, Germany |
|
|
BR 1 mm/s for 120 s |
|
Biofilm remnants on BR and CAP impaired MG-63 cell development, whilst BR+CAP provided an increased area of MG-63 cells |
Ibis F et al. 2016 [50] |
|
Escherichia coli; Staphylococcusaureus | n/a | Custom made | n/a | n/a | n/a |
|
Up to > 95% biofilm was inactivated by CAP and up to 50% was retarded. Increased hydrophilicity after CAP was obtained. |
Lee et al. 2016 [51] |
|
No contamination | n/a | Custom made | Pure He/He and O2D: 20 mm | n/a | n/a |
|
CAP treatment enhances wettability of the Ti surfaces especially for the He/O2 CAP |
Preissner et al. 2016 [53] |
|
Streptococcus mitis | Eight implants per group (32) | TTP60 and TTP120, kINPen Med (INP Greifswald, Germany) | TTP 60: 60 s; Ar 4.3 slm; |
|
1.
|
|
Number of dead cells was higher with CAP compared to DL and control |
TTP 120: 120 s; Ar 4.3 slm | n/a | ||||||||
Canullo et al. 2017 [44] |
|
Streptococcus mitis | (720) | Plasma beam mini (Diener Electronic) |
|
n/a | n/a |
|
CAP enhanced MC3T3-E1 attachment and spreading as well as bacterial decontamination |
Canullo et al. 2017 [43] |
|
No contamination | 92 discs per group (216) | Plasma R (Sweden & Martina) |
|
Untreated | n/a |
|
CAP showed a positive effect on MG-63 cells grown on CAP-treated and untreated machined, plasma sprayed, and zirconia discs. |
Matthes et al. 2017 [52] |
|
Biofilm formed in vitro from subgingival plaque | 200 | kINPen09, neoplas GmbH, INP Greifswald, Germany |
|
|
1 and 2 Erythritol for 90 s |
|
AA + CAP did not enhance MG-63 spreading compared to AA alone. |
Matthes et al. 2017 [52] |
|
Biofilm formed in vitro from subgingival plaque | 200 | kINPen09, neoplas GmbH, INP Greifswald, Germany |
|
|
1 and 2 Erythritol for 90 s |
|
AA+CAP did not enhance MG-63 spreading compared to AA alone. |
Karaman et al. 2018 [27] |
|
No contamination | n/a | Custom made | n/a |
|
n/a |
|
RGD + CAP significantly increased cell adhesion and proliferation |
Canullo et al.2018 [45] |
|
No contamination | Four implants per animal (eight beagle dogs) | Ar-plasma (Diener electronic, Jettingen, Germany) |
|
Untreated | n/a |
|
Implants treated using AR-plasma reached higher BIC when compared to untreated |
Ulu et al. 2018 [55] |
|
S. aureus | 76 | Plasma One (Plasma Medical Systems, Bad Ems, Germany) |
|
Laser ER:YAG | 30 s at 100mJ/pulse power |
|
Cap showed superior antibiofilm activity than contact and noncontact laser treatment without temperature increase or damages to the surface of Ti discs |
Yang et al. 2018 [12] |
|
Porphyromonas gingivalis | n/a | Custom made |
|
Untreated | n/a |
|
CAP improved surface hydrophilicity and roughness and completely eliminated P. ginigvalis in 360 s, promoting growth of both cell lines |
Lee et al. 2019 [37] |
|
P. gingivalis | Five discs per group, two discs per group | Custom made |
|
UntreatedHe without CAPHe + CAP | n/a |
|
He-CAP was effective for removing P. gingivalis from SLA discs without surface alterations |
Matthes et al. 2019 [28] |
|
No contamination | n/a | kINPen09, kINPen08 and kiNPen Chamber, (INP Greifswald, Germany) |
|
0.2% CHX;0.1% octenidine;70% ethanol | Antiseptic solutions for 900 s |
|
CAP reduced water contact angle and supported cell coverage, whereas CHX and octenidine reduced cell surface coverage. |
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
Naujokat et al. 2019 [22] |
|
No contamination | 16 implants | kINPen Med, INP Greifswald, Germany |
|
Untreated | n/a |
|
CAP did not lead to remarkable change in surface morphology. CAP conditioning prior to insertion resulted in higher BIC and ITBD, but not faster or stronger bone adherence and mineralization |
Smeets et al. 2019 [54] |
|
No contamination | (364) | Yocto III (Diener Electronic) | CAP 1
|
1. UV |
1a.
|
|
CAP and UV caused a significant reduction of organic material, increased the hydrophilicity of zirconia, and improved the conditions for osteoblasts |
| |||||||||
| |||||||||
Yang et al. 2020 [21] |
|
S. mutans; P. gingivalis | n/a | CAP Med-I (Plasma Health Scientech Group, Tsinghua University, China) |
CAP1
|
Untreated | n/a |
|
The He-CAP jet increased hydrophilicity without changing surface topography and eliminated bacterial growth with surface chemistry change. |
Abbreviations: Titanium (Ti); Cold atmospheric plasma (CAP); Alumina-blasted/acid-etched (AB/AE); Surface energy (SE); Bone-to-implant contact (BIC); Bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO); Human osteoblastic cells (MG-63); Calcium phosphate (CaP); Argon (Ar); Helium (He); Oxygen (O); Diode laser (DL); Air abrasion (AA); Grit-blasted/acid-etched (GB/AE); Brushing (BR); Autoclaved biofilm (Auto); Anodic spark deposition (ASD); Resorbable blast media (RBM); Sandblasting with large grit followed by acid-etching (SLA); Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs); chlorhexidine (CHX); Interthread bone density (ITBD); Peri-implant bone density (PIBD); Murine fibroblastic cells (L929).