Table 2.

(A) Table of the radius $\left(R_{x,y}\right)$ estimated for the 250 nm of radius beads with all different methods. Results calculated over 43 trajectories with a minimum of 100 positions each and an uncertainty on the radius evaluated at ±55 nm. (B) Table of the radius $\left(R_{x,y}\right)$ estimated for the 110 nm of radius beads with all different methods. Results calculated over 25 trajectories with a minimum of 100 positions each and an uncertainty on the radius evaluated at ±32 nm.

(A) r = 250 nm	MSD	${\mathit{D}}_1$	${\mathit{D}}_2$	<${\mathit{D}}_1$>	<${\mathit{D}}_2$>	${\mathit{D}}_{\mathit{CVE}(\mathit{\sigma },\mathit{R})}$	$<{\mathit{D}}_{\mathit{CVE}(\mathit{\sigma },\mathit{R})}>$	${\mathit{D}}_{\mathit{CVE}}$
Mean radius $R_x$ (nm)	411	252	308	253	308	269	270	418
$\sigma \left(R_x\right)$ (nm)	115	46	58	46	58	58	58	127
Mean radius $R_y$ (nm)	725	221	325	221	325	230	231	746
$\sigma \left(R_y\right)$ (nm)	439	41	69	42	68	51	51	507
$R_z$ = ($R_x$+$R_y$)/2 (nm)	568	237	316	237	316	250	250	582
(B) r = 110 nm	MSD	${\mathit{D}}_{\mathbf{1}}$	${\mathit{D}}_{\mathbf{2}}$	< ${\mathit{D}}_{\mathbf{1}}$ >	< ${\mathit{D}}_{\mathbf{2}}$ >	${\mathit{D}}_{\mathit{CVE}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{\sigma }\mathbf{,}\mathit{R}\mathbf{)}}$	$\mathbf{<}{\mathit{D}}_{\mathit{CVE}\mathbf{(}\mathbf{\sigma }\mathbf{,}\mathit{R}\mathbf{)}}\mathbf{>}$	${\mathit{D}}_{\mathit{CVE}}$
Mean radius $R_x$ (nm)	143	101	116	101	116	105	106	160
$\sigma \left(R_x\right)$ (nm)	31	15	13	15	13	19	19	43
Mean radius $R_y$ (nm)	286	90	131	90	131	92	92	90
$\sigma \left(R_y\right)$ (nm)	220	12	25	12	25	14	15	12
$R_z$ = ($R_x$+$R_y$)/2 (nm)	214	96	124	96	123	99	99	125