Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 19;11:827. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00827

Table 3.

Comparison of mean OCS scores (percent change) between active and sham treatments one week after treatment.

Statistic Baseline (Week 1) Active Pct Difference (Active − Baseline) Sham Pct Difference (Sham − Baseline) Difference of Pct Differences (Active − Sham)
N 17 17 17 17 17 17
Mean (SD) 6.9 (1.3) 3.5 (2.7) −51.0 (33.7) 5.8 (2.6) −15.8 (35.0) −35.2 (48.2)
Median 7.0 3.3 −60.0 6.7 −4.2 −31.8
Min, Max 4.3, 9.0 0.0, 8.3 −100, 0.0 2.0, 9.0 −72.7, 33.3 −115, 52.4
95% CI (6.2, 7.6) (2.1, 4.9) (−68.3, −33.7) (4.5, 7.2) (−33.7, 2.2) (−60.0, −10.5)
p-value (paired t-test) <.0001 0.0408 0.0041
p-value (signed-rank test) <.0001 0.0898 0.0040

All Randomized Patients with Complete Data.

[1] Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were performed to assess percent change from baseline in the OCS score one week after active treatment and sham treatment, separately.

[2] A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed to compare the percent change from baseline in the OCS score on active treatment versus sham treatment (Difference of Percent Differences column). A positive value for the difference of percent difference favors sham treatment, while a negative value favors active treatment.

[3] One-sided lower p-values were calculated for all tests.