Table 1.
Source of tumor exosomes | Purification method | Aim of study | Treatment regimen | Key results | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
-HeLa cell line | Ultracentrifugation/sucrose gradient | In vitro investigation of HeLa-derived exosomes immunogenicity. | Capacity of HeLa-TEX for inducing immune responses was examined. |
|
135 |
-EG7 expressing ovalbumin (OVA- transfected EL4 mouse thymoma) cell line | Ultracentrifugation | Comparison between TEX and dendritic cell-derived exosomes (DEXs) based vaccination. | Melanoma-bearing mice were immunized intravenously with OVA pulsed DC-derived exosomes (EXODC) or tumor-derived exosomes (TEXEG7) (10 µg/mouse). |
|
11 |
-EG7 expressing ovalbumin (OVA- transfected EL4 mouse thymoma) cell line | Ultracentrifugation | Comparison of immunogenicity between OVA protein pulsed DC-derived exosomes (EXODC) and DC pulsed with TEXOVA (DCEXO). | Melanoma-bearing mice were treated intravenously with EXODC or DCEXO vaccines. |
|
144 |
-A20 (H-2d) mouse B lymphoma/leukemia cell line (Exo) -Heat-shocked A20 (H-2d) mouse B lymphoma/leukemia cell line (HS-Exo) - murine colon cancer CT-26 cell line |
Ultracentrifugation | Evaluation of heat shock induction in improvement of exosome-based tumor vaccines. | Lymphoma/leukemia-bearing BALB/c mice were immunized subcutaneously with TEX and HS-TEX (10 µg/mouse) |
|
28 |
- B16F1 murine melanoma cell line - CIITA gene (MHC class II transcriptional activator) transduced B16F1cell line |
Ultracentrifugation/sucrose gradient | Investigation of CIITA transduction effect in enhancing immune stimulation as compared to exosomes from parental tumor cells (TEX). | -For preventive model, C57BL/6 mice were intradermally vaccinated with PBS, TEX or CIITA-TEX (5 or 20 µg/mouse), and then challenged subcutaneously with melanoma B16F1 cells. -For therapeutic model, B16F1 melanome-bearing mice were immunized intradermally with PBS, TEX and CIITA-TEX (20 µg/mouse). |
|
29 |
-Murine colon cancer CT-26 cell line -CIITA gene transduced CT-26 cell line |
Ultracentrifugation/sucrose gradient | Transduction of CIITA gene into CT26 cell line and evaluation of immune response induction by CT-26-CIITA TEX compared to parental CT-26 TEX. | Balb/c mice were intradermally immunized with PBS, CT-26 TEX and CT-26 -CIITA TEX (10 or 20 µg/mouse), and challenged subcutaneously with CT-26 cells. |
|
30 |
-K562 leukemia cell line -L1210 acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line |
Ultracentrifugation/sucrose gradient | Examination of L1210-TEX and DC- L1210 TEX ability in induction of protective antitumor immunity in leukemia mice model. | - For therapeutic model, DBA/2 mice were immunized subcutaneously with PBS, L1210-TEX (30 µg/mouse), non-pulsed DC and DC-L1210 TEX (1.0–4.0 × 106cells/mouse), then challenged with L1210 leukemia cells. - For preventive model, after challenging with L1210 leukemia cells, DBA/2 mice were immunized. |
|
31 |
-Myeloid leukemia WEHI3B cell line -Renal cell carcinoma (RENCA) cell line |
Ultracentrifugation/sucrose gradient | Efficacy evaluation of TEX- vs. tumor lysate-loaded DC as vaccines in WEHI3 myeloid leukemia and RENCA bearing mice. | Balb/c mice were challenged intravenously or subcutaneously with WEHI3B and RENCA cells, and then were vaccinated with DC-lysate, DC-TEX and TEX alone. (200 µg/mouse) |
|
12 |
- UNKC6141 pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line (UNKC) | Ultracentrifugation/sucrose gradient | Strengthen of the therapeutic efficacy of DC-TEX vaccination by blocking of MDSC maturation and activation in pancreatic cancer (PaCa). | UNKC-bearing mice (subcutaneously or orthotopic) after AGS (ATRA, Gemcitabine and Sunitinib) application were immunized intravenously with TEX-loaded DC (DC-TEX). |
|
152 |
-Murine breast cancer 4T1 cell line | Gradient ultracentrifugation |
Modification of miRNA content of TEXs for enhancement of DC maturation and effector cells activation. | TEX loaded with mimics of miRNAs (miR-155, miR-142, and let-7i) to induce potent dendritic cells (DC) and improve immune stimulation. |
|
153 |
-Murine melanoma B16BL6 cell line | Ultracentrifugation | Co-delivery of tumor antigens and adjuvant by genetic modification of exosomes. | B16BL6 cells were transfected with immunostimulatory CpG DNA and then their derived TEXs were utilized as a vaccine in melanoma bearing mice. |
|
154 |
-HEK293 cell line | Ultracentrifugation | Direct vaccination of murine models with antitumor let7a microRNA and GE11 binding peptide-modified TEX. | Let-7a – GE11 containing TEX were administrated in human tumor xenograft models. |
|
155 |
-AB1 mouse mesothelioma cell line | Ultracentrifugation | Direct comparison of TEX-DC and lysate-DC vaccination in mesothelioma cancer model. | Mesothelioma bearing mice were treated with TEX-loaded DC and lysate-loaded DC vaccines. |
|
156 |
-Autologous glioma tumor cells (from patients with glioblastoma multiform) | Ultrafiltration/centrifugation/sucrose Gradient/ultracentrifugation | Assessment of the capacity of autologous glioma tumor cells-derived exosomes in CTLs activity induction compare to tumor lysate. | DCs were pulsed with glioma cells and their derived TEXs, and in vitro CTL activity was then evaluated. |
|
157 |
-Myeloma J558 cell line expressing P1A tumor antigen | Ultracentrifugation/sucrose gradient | The comparison of immune responses induced by EXOHSP expressing membrane-bound HSP70 (TEXHSP) or EXO expressing cytoplasmic HSP70 (TEXHS). | Myeloma J558 cell line were transfected by membrane-bound inducible HSP70 expressing vectors and then myeloma bearing mice were treated with TEXHSP or TEXHS pulsed DCs. |
|
158 |
-MUC1-expressing CT26 cell line | Ultracentrifugation/sucrose gradient | Enhancement of the immune-stimulating activity of TEXs by heat treatment of tumor cells. | MUC1-CT26 cells were exposed to heat shock, then tumor bearing mice were vaccinated by HS-TEX or untreated TEX. |
|
159 |
-CT26 murine colon carcinoma cell line -TA3HA murine mammary carcinoma cell line |
Ultracentrifugation/sucrose gradient | Genetic manipulation of TEXs for tumor antigens delivery. | Immunogenic potential of MUC-containing exosomes was tested in autogenic and allogeneic tumors. |
|
24 |
-EG7 expressing ovalbumin cell line (OVA- transfected EL4 mouse thymoma cell line) | Ultracentrifugation/sucrose gradient | Protein transfer of SEA on TEXs in order to increase their immunogenicity. | C57BL/6 mice were immunized subcutaneously with TEX, SEA-TEX or mixture of TEX and SEA, and were challenged with EG7-OVA cells. |
|
160 |
-L1210 murine B lymphocytic leukemia cell line |
Ultrafiltration Centrifugation/sucrose gradient/ultracentrifugation |
Assessment of L1210-derived TEXs impact as a prophylactic vaccine in syngeneic mice models. | DBA/2 mice were subcutaneously immunized with L1210-TEXs (2.5 or 5 µg) and then challenged with L1210 leukemia cells. |
|
149 |
-Fon (HLA-A2+) and Mel-888 (HLA-A2−) human melanoma tumor cell lines |
Ultracentrifugation/sucrose gradient | The comparison of immune responses induced by TEXs and tumor cells lysate in prophylactic and therapeutic mice models. | Mice models were immunized by different doses of TEXs and tumor cell-derived lysate as alone or loaded on DC. |
|
13 |
-AB1 mouse mesothelioma cell line | Ultracentrifugation | Study of the impact of antigen source in cancer immunotherapy outcome. | Mesothelioma bearing mice were treated with DCs loaded by different antigen sources (tumor cell line lysate, ex vivo tumor lysate and tumor cell line-derived TEX). |
|
161 |
- B16-OVA and B16 melanoma cell lines | sucrose gradient/ultracentrifugation | Evaluation of the effect of VSV-G incorporation in TEXs on their immunogenicity. | Melanoma cell lines B16-OVA and B16 were transduced by VSV-G-expressing vectors and then melanoma bearing mice were treated with VSV-G containing TEXs loaded on DC. |
|
162 |
-E.G7-OVA tumor cells expressing Ovalbumin (OVA) |
Serial centrifugation/sucrose gradients/ultracentrifugation | Further improvement of TEX-based vaccination through expression of IL-2 in them. | E.G7-OVA tumor cells were transfected with IL-2 gene and then tumor bearing mice were immunized with TEX/IL-2, TEX+IL-2 and TEX alone. |
|
163 |
-Human RC-2 renal cancer cell line | Ultracentrifugation | Improving TEX immunogenicity by IL-12 gene modification in tumor cells. | Human renal tumor cells were genetically modified with IL-12 gene and then in vitro immune responses of TEX/IL-12 derived from these cells were examined. |
|
164 |
-B16F1 melanoma cell line | Ultracentrifugation | In vitro assessment of immunological activity of melanoma cell-derived TEXs (mcd-TEXs). | Immunogenic potential of mcd-TEXs was tested in vitro. |
|
83 |
- Hepa1-6 murine hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell line -Human HepG2 and Hep3B HCC cell lines |
Ultracentrifugation | Human in vitro and murine in vivo study of immune efficacy of HCC cell line-derived TEXs compare to cell lysate. | -For murine in vivo study, C57BL6 mice were immunized subcutaneously with PBS, TEX-pulsed DC (30 µg/mouse), lysate-pulsed DC in therapeutic and preventive as well as ectopic and orthotopic models. -For human in vitro study, DCs were pulsed with TEXs and then in vitro CTL activity was evaluated. |
|
165 |
-B16BL6 melanoma cell line -Murine melanoma tumor |
Homogenization/sonication/ultracentrifugation | Assessment of the therapeutic effect of autologous TEXs in melanoma tumor and metastatic mice models. | Autologous murine melanoma tumors were dissected and homogenized, and then immunogenicity of their isolated TEXs was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. |
|
139 |
- Hepa1-6 cell line | Ultracentrifugation | In vivo evaluation of the effect of DC-TEX and sorafenib combination on treatment outcome. | Orthotopic HCC mice were vaccinated with different combinations of DC-TEX, sorafenib and PD-1 Ab, and then in vivo immune responses were evaluated. |
|
166 |