Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;38:101746. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101746

Table 4.

Results from the panel VAR.

Variables ytmd lcc lvix utsd ann
L.ytmd 0.989*** -0.788*** -0.661*** -0.00383*** -0.257***
(0.0144) (0.0981) (0.0706) (0.000532) (0.0661)
L.lcc 0.00125*** 0.938*** -0.0237*** -0.000115*** 0.00232
(0.000313) (0.00398) (0.00196) (1.51e-05) (0.00145)
L.lvix 0.0111*** -0.183*** 0.829*** -0.000108 0.0868***
(0.00155) (0.0198) (0.00792) (8.56e-05) (0.00920)
L.ustd 2.008*** 14.18*** 43.39*** 0.637*** -14.48***
(0.323) (1.898) (2.058) (0.0130) (1.061)
L.ann -0.00813*** 0.0651*** -0.0992*** 0.000549*** 0.493***
(0.00127) (0.0114) (0.0126) (4.49e-05) (0.0417)
Observations 2,971 2,971 2,971 2,971 2,971
Number of countries 48

Notes: Standard errors in parentheses: *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, and * p < 0.1 The PVAR model is estimated by a fixed-effect GMM, accounting for lags and using logarithm results in data losses on the temporal dimension. The number of lags is equal to 1 for the PVAR and 2 for the instruments; the estimates cause the sample to lose 48 * 2 = 96 points. The lcc variable leads to a loss of 5 points (see the descriptive statistics with a minimum of 0). Finally, for the PVAR estimate, the number of observations is 3072 - 96 - 5 = 2971.