Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;15(9):e0238445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238445

Table 3. Correlation between outcomes of strength measurement and synergy weights determined with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients (ρ) in DMD.

GLU REF MEH TIA GAS
Synergy one
KE MVIC [Nm·kg-1] -0.11 -0.26 0.08 0.03 -0.10
KF MVIC [Nm·kg-1] 0.08 -0.17 -0.24 0.03 0.10
DF MVIC [Nm·kg-1] -0.32 -0.15 0.29 -0.14 0.23
PF MVIC[Nm·kg-1] 0.22 -0.11 -0.36 0.09 -0.25
Synergy two
KE MVIC [Nm·kg-1] -0.30 -0.03 0.20 -0.16 0.06
KF MVIC [Nm·kg-1] -0.17 0.07 0.12 0.22 -0.03
DF MVIC [Nm·kg-1] 0.17 -0.33 -0.40 0.11 0.19
PF MVIC [Nm·kg-1] -0.04 0.02 0.35 0.18 -0.30
Synergy three
KE MVIC [Nm·kg-1] 0.20 0.10 -0.11 -0.22 0.06
KF MVIC [Nm·kg-1] -0.05 0.08 0.19 -0.21 0.23
DF MVIC [Nm·kg-1] 0.08 0.23 -0.16 0.00 -0.07
PF MVIC [Nm·kg-1] -0.13 0.24 0.06 -0.10 0.13

Moderate to good correlations are in bold.

Abbreviations in alphabetic order: DF = dorsiflexion; DMD = Duchenne muscular dystrophy; GAS = gastrocnemius; GLU = gluteus medius; KE = knee extension; KF = knee flexion; MEH = medial hamstrings; MVIC = maximal voluntary isometric contraction; Nm·kg-1 = Newton meters per kilogram body weight; PF = plantar flexion; REF = rectus femoris; TIA = tibialis anterior.

*p < 0.01

**p < 0.001