Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 10;37(7):3040–3058. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01397-9

Table 2.

List of adjusted variables in the three population-adjusted ITCs

MAIC by Oluwole et al.
(Adjusted 7 variables)
MAIC by the authors
(Adjusted 10 variables)
CAR-T prediction model by the authors
(Adjusted 13 variables)
Cell of origin (e.g., DLBCL/other types of LBCL) Predominant histology (DLBCL + tFL vs. other) Predominant histology (DLBCL + tFL vs. other)
IPI score (< 2 vs. ≥ 2) IPI (< 3 vs. ≥ 3) IPI (< 3 vs. ≥ 3)
ECOG (1 vs. 0) ECOG (1 vs. 0) ECOG (1 vs. 0)
Number of prior therapies (< 3, 3, or ≥ 4) Prior lines of therapy (< 3 vs. ≥ 3) Prior lines of therapy (< 3 vs. ≥ 3)
Relapsed/refractory disease (relapsed/refractory) History of refractory disease (yes vs. no) History of refractory (yes vs. no)
Double/triple hit (yes vs. no) Double/triple hits (yes vs. no) Double/triple hits (yes vs. no)
Disease stage (< 3, 3, or 4)

Sex

Prior ASCT (yes vs. no)

Relapse ≤ 12 months post-ASCT (yes vs. no)

Bulky disease (≥ 10 cm vs. < 10 cm)

Sex

Prior ASCT (yes vs. no)

Relapse ≤ 12 months post-ASCT (yes vs. no)

Bulky disease (≥ 10 cm vs. < 10 cm)

Bridging chemotherapy (yes vs. no)

Fludarabine-based LDC (yes vs. no)

Bendamustine-based LDC (yes vs. no)

Variables that were only able to be adjusted for in the prediction model are in bold type

ASCT autologous stem cell transplant, CAR-T chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, DLBCL diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, IPI International Prognostic Index, ITC indirect treatment comparison, LBCL large B-cell lymphoma, LDC lymphodepleting chemotherapy, MAIC matching-adjusted indirect comparison, tFL transformed follicular lymphoma