Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 9;37(5):2210–2223. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01320-2

Table 5.

Clinical outcomes

Variable All De novo BMS-ISR DES-ISR p value
Number of patients 481 377 19 85
Patients with clinical follow-up 463 (96.3%) 360 (95.5%) 19 (100.0%) 84 (98.8%) 0.234
Time to discharge, days 2.2 ± 5.9 2.0 ± 6.3 6.0 ± 7.7 2.0 ± 2.1 0.016
Follow-up time (months)a 9.4 ± 2.9 9.5 ± 2.9 9.2 ± 0.6 9.3 ± 3.2 0.831
In hospital TLF 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
In hospital Re-PTCA 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
In hospital CABG 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
In hospital MI 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
In hospital cardiac death 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Accumulated TLF 14 (3.0%) 4 (1.1%) 2 (10.5%) 8 (9.5%)  < 0.001
Accumulated TLR 9 (1.9%) 3 (0.8%) 1 (5.3%) 5 (6.0%) 0.005
Accumulated Re-PTCA 9 (1.9%) 3 (0.8%) 1 (5.3%) 5 (6.0%) 0.005
Accumulated CABG 1 (0.2%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (1.2%) 0.104
Accumulated MI 2 (0.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (2.4%) 0.011
Accumulated cardiac death 4 (0.9%) 1 (0.3%) 1 (5.3%) 2 (2.4%) 0.018
Accumulated TVR 11 (2.4%) 4 (1.1%) 1 (5.3%) 6 (7.1%) 0.003
Accumulated non-target vessel revascularization 10 (2.2%) 5 (1.4%) 2 (10.5%) 3 (3.6%) 0.017
Accumulated vessel thrombosis 1 (0.2%) 1 (0.3%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0.866

BMS bare metal stent, CABG coronary artery bypass graft, DES drug-eluting stent, ISR in-stent restenosis, MI myocardial infarction, PTCA percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, TLF target lesion failure, TVR target vessel revascularization

aSingle-factor ANOVA, otherwise χ2 or Fisher’s exact test whenever applicable