Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 13;13(4):674–683. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa039

Table 4.

Diagnostic predictiveness (bias, precision and accuracy stratified by eGFR) in CKD cohorts

eGFRCKD-EPI Number Age (years) BMI (kg/m2) Equation Bias (mL/min/1.73 m2) Precision (mL/min/1.73 m2) Absolute error (%) P30 (%)
<30 1504 72 27 CKD-EPI −0.3 (−0.7, 0.0) 6.8 (6.4–7.2) 18.1 (16.8–18.9) 74.5 (72.3–76.7)
FAS 2.0 (1.6–2.2) 7.0 (6.7–7.4) 19.6 (18.2–20.8) 68.4 (66.1–70.8)
LMR −1.1 (−1.4, −0.8) 6.7 (6.4, 7.2) 17.8 (17.018.6) 77.1 (75.079.3)
30–59 2419 65 27 CKD-EPI 1.6 (1.22.1) 12.5 (11.913.3) 15.3 (14.716.0) 78.6 (77.0–80.3)
FAS 1.9 (1.5–2.4) 13.5 (13.0–14.2) 15.8 (15.2–16.6) 76.6 (74.9–78.3)
LMR −1.8 (−2.4, −1.4) 12.6 (11.9–13.1) 15.7 (14.9–16.4) 81.1 (79.582.7)
60–89 2130 58 25 CKD-EPI 6.5 (5.6–7.2) 19.7 (18.9–20.8) 15.8 (14.8–16.6) 76.3 (74.5–78.1)
FAS 1.8 (1.0–2.7) 19.7 (18.7–20.7) 14.0 (13.3–14.5) 82.1 (80.5–83.7)
LMR −0.7 (−1.4, 0.0) 18.8 (18.019.9) 13.8 (13.214.3) 84.0 (82.485.5)
90–119 1578 46 24 CKD-EPI 10.1 (9.2–11.2) 21.2 (20.2–22.4) 13.6 (12.7–14.6) 80.4 (78.5–82.4)
FAS 7.3 (6.4–8.0) 21.8 (20.5–23.2) 12.6 (12.1–13.4) 81.6 (79.6–83.5)
LMR −2.8 (−3.7, −1.8) 20.8 (19.722.0) 11.7 (11.112.3) 90.1 (88.691.6)
≥120 734 21 21 CKD-EPI 22.5 (20.6–23.8) 24.3 (22.325.8) 21.1 (19.2–22.5) 67.0 (63.6–70.4)
FAS 20.4 (17.9–22.3) 33.7 (30.7–37.1) 19.6 (17.7–21.9) 65.8 (62.4–69.2)
LMR −0.6 (−2.9, 1.1) 25.2 (22.9–27.4) 11.2 (10.612.4) 88.7 (86.491.0)

Estimation results for CKD-EPI, FAS and LMR (95% CI) stratified by eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) based on the CKD-EPI equation (eGFRCKD-EPI). The best result for each performance marker is marked with bold and italic in each stratum. Number of patients, median age (years) and BMI (kg/m2) are given in each stratum Median bias (eGFR − mGFR) and precision (IQR) expressed in mL/min/1.73m2. Absolute error expressed as median absolute percentage error |eGFR − mGFR|/mGFR, and P10 and P30 accuracy (percentage of GFR estimates within 10% and 30% of mGFR).