Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 13;13(4):674–683. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa039

Table 5.

Diagnostic predictiveness (bias, precision and accuracy stratified by eGFR) in community cohorts

eGFRCKD-EPI Number Age (years) BMI (kg/m2) Equations Bias (mL/min/1.73m2) Precision (mL/min/1.73m2) Absolute error (%) P30 (%)
<60a 473 78 27 CKD-EPI −0.2 (−1.2, 0.6) 12.8 (12.2–14.5) 13.7 (12.215.5) 83.7 (80.4–87.1)
FAS −4.3 (−5.0, −3.4) 12.2 (10.7–13.9) 13.9 (12.8–15.5) 85.4 (82.288.6)
LMR −4.5 (−5.2, −3.3) 11.9 (10.913.8) 15.1 (13.8–16.1) 82.5 (79.0–85.9)
60–89 2479 63 27 CKD-EPI 1.0 (0.41.7) 18.2 (17.3–19.0) 11.6 (11.112.2) 85.7 (82.4–89.0)
FAS −5.8 (−6.2, −5.2) 15.5 (14.816.3) 11.7 (11.2–12.2) 92.7 (91.693.7)
LMR −7.1 (−7.6, −6.5) 16.3 (15.5–17.1) 12.4 (12.0–12.9) 91.4 (90.3–92.5)
90–119 3687 55 26 CKD-EPI 3.0 (2.6–3.6) 17.0 (16.417.7) 9.2 (8.99.7) 88.9 (87.6–90.1)
FAS 2.2 (1.72.7) 18.4 (17.7–19.2) 9.6 (9.2–10.0) 92.9 (92.1–93.7)
LMR −7.0 (−7.6, −6.5) 17.2 (16.6–17.8) 10.7 (10.3–11.0) 94.8 (94.095.5)
≥120 120 29 23 CKD-EPI 12.9 (6.9–15.6) 18.7 (15.422.5) 12.8 (10.7–15.6) 92.5 (87.7–97.3)
FAS 19.3 (15.5–23.2) 26.8 (20.5–29.7) 16.3 (14.0–21.9) 73.3 (65.3–81.4)
LMR −4.5 (−7.9, −1.8) 19.1 (16.0–23.9) 9.6 (8.610.6) 98.3 (94.199.8)

Estimation results for CKD-EPI, FAS and LMR (95% CI) stratified by eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) based on the CKD-EPI equation (eGFRCKD-EPI). The best result for each performance marker is marked with bold and italic in each stratum. Number of patients, median age (years) and BMI (kg/m2) are given in each stratum Median bias (eGFR − mGFR) and precision (IQR) expressed in mL/min/1.73m2. Absolute error expressed as median absolute percentage error |eGFR − mGFR|/mGFR, and P10 and P30 accuracy (percentage of GFR estimates within 10% and 30% of mGFR). amGFR intervals <44 were collapsed with 45–59 due to small numbers (<100).