Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 27;146(10):2575–2587. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03315-6

Table 2.

Study designs

Author Study type Intervention Comparator Location(s)
Seidensticker 2012 Non-randomized observational study [matched analysis based on prior treatment history, tumor burden, liver involvement., synchronous versus metachronous metastases, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) increase, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)] SIRT (n = 29) BSC (n = 29) Germany
Hendlisz 2010 (NCT00199173) Randomized open-label trial SIRT + 5-fluorouracil (n = 21) 5-fluorouracil with cross-over to SIRT upon progression at investigators' discretion (n = 23) Belgium
Bester 2012 Non-randomized interventional study of SIRT with control group formed of patients ineligible for SIRT patients (multivariable regression including potential prognostic factors conducted for survival analysis only). CRC patients only SIRT (n = 224) BSC (n = 29) Australia
Yoshino 2012 (JapicCTI-090880) Randomized double-blind trial TAS-102 at 35 mg/m2 twice daily (n = 112) Placebo + BSC (n = 57). Cross-over not permitted Japan
Mayer 2015 (RECOURSE, NCT01607957) Randomized double-blind trial TAS-102 at 35 mg/m2 twice daily (n = 534) Placebo + BSC (n = 266). Cross-over not permitted Japan, United States, Europe, and Australia
Li 2015 (CONCUR, NCT01584830) Randomized double-blind trial Regorafenib at 160 mg/day (n = 136) Placebo + BSC (n = 68) China, Hong Kong, South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam
Grothey 2013 (CORRECT, NCT01103323) Randomized double-blind trial Regorafenib at 160 mg/day (n = 505) Placebo + BSC (n = 255). Crossover not permitted North America, western Europe, Israel, Australia, Asia, and Eastern Europe

BSC best supportive care, CRC colorectal cancer, SIRT selective internal radiation therapy