Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 2;21:15. doi: 10.1186/s10195-020-00551-x

Table 1.

Summary of clinical outcomes and survivorship in studies comparing UKA and TKA

S. no. Author Year Type of study Age, mean (years) Number of patients Follow-up, mean (years) Prosthesis implanted Functional scores, mean Range of motion, mean (°) Survivorship (%)
UKA TKA UKA TKA UKA TKA UKA TKA UKA TKA UKA TKA UKA TKA
1 Siman et al. [28] 2017 Retrospective 80.1 79.6 120 188 3.5 4.6 Multiple Multiple KSS (F) 85.4 84 119.3 111.3 98.3 98.8
2 Lum et al. [29] 2016 Retrospective 63.3 65.7 201 189 5.4 5.5 Oxford Vanguard Zimmer KSS (K/F)78/77.6 66/66 118.7 111.6 98.5 96.8
3 Horikawa et al. [30] 2015 Retrospective 74 72.2 28 50 9 10.5 Stryker EIUS Stryker Scorpio NRG JOA 80.2 81.1 142.5 126 84 92
4 Bolognesi et al. [31] 2013 Retrospective 74.2 74.6 2844 64,932 82 96.3
5 Lyons et al. [32] 2011 Retrospective 66.02 67.65 279 5606 7.12 6.5 Multiple Multiple KSS (K/F) 79.55/65.74 90.58/89.72 90 95
6 Costa et al. [33] 2011 Prospective 73 73 34 34 5 5 EIUS Zimmer Stryker Scorpio NRG KSS (K/F) 96/91 96/91 85 100
7 Sun et al. [34] 2010 Prospective 60 61 28 28 ~ 4 ~ 4 Oxford AGC Biomet KSS (F) 80.5 78.9 117 115 75 100
8 Newman et al. [35] 2009 Prospective 69.6 69.8 52 50 15 15 St. Georg Sled Kinematic modular BKS 92 87.5 89.8 78.7
9 Amin et al. [36] 2006 Prospective 68.1 69.3 54 54 ~ 5 ~ 5 KSS (K/F) 82/85 84/84 102 105 85 98
10 Ackroyd et al. [37] 2002 Prospective 70 72 408 531 6.4 5.7 St. Georg Sled Kinematic modular BKS (> 80 points) 77.9% 75.1% 109.3 99.9 87.5 89.6
11 Weale et al. [9] 1998 Prospective 69.6 69.8 50 52 5 5 St. Georg Sled Kinematic modular 117.3 108 96 98

JOA Japanese Orthopedic Association, BKS Bristol Knee Scoring, KSS (K/F) Knee Society score (Knee score/Function score)