Table D.3.
Variable | Year | 2D CTM, TROPOS |
Literature |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transient | Steady-statea | Study | Ref | Model/Years | Variable estimate/change | ||
CH4 burden, Tg |
2000 |
4770.8 |
4785.1 |
||||
IPCC TAR | 1998 | 4850 Tg | |||||
Voulgarakis et al. (2013) | ACCMIP | 4750d Tg | |||||
Dalsøren et al. (2016) | Oslo CTM3 | 4560d Tg | |||||
Dalsøren et al. (2016) | 1970–2012 |
+15% | |||||
This studyc |
+13% |
||||||
2050 |
5051.6 |
5081.4 |
Voulgarakis et al. (2013) Voulgarakis et al. (2013) This studyc |
ACCMIP | 5000d Tg +5.3d % +5.9% |
||
2000–2050 |
|||||||
CH4 abundance, ppb |
2000 |
1784.2 |
1787.5 |
Observations |
NOAA AGAGE WDCGG |
1773 ppb 1774 ppb 1783 ppb |
|
2050 |
1886.2 |
1897.6 |
Meinshausen et al. (2011) |
MAGICC |
1833 ppb |
||
CH4 lifetime (τCH4+OH)b, yr |
2000 |
10.6 |
10.5 |
Prather et al. (2012) Voulgarakis et al. (2013) Holmes et al. (2013) This studyc Voulgarakis et al. (2013) This studyc |
CH3CCl3-based | 11.2 ± 1.3 yr 9.8 ± 1.6 yr −2.2 ± 1.8% −2.06% −4% −2% |
|
ACCMIP | |||||||
1980/85–2000/05 | |||||||
1980–2000 |
|||||||
2050 |
11.0 |
11.0 |
Voulgarakis et al. (2013) This studyc |
2000–2050 |
+1.0d % +3.5% |
||
aircraft CH4 lifetime (τCH4+OH), yr | 2000 |
−0.137 |
−0.145 |
Hoor et al. (2009) Myhre et al. (2011) Holmes et al. (2011) Søvde et al. (2014) This studyc |
AERO2K QUANTIFY Model ensemble REACT4C dENOx = QUANTIFY |
−1.55% Tg(N)−1 | |
−1.46% Tg(N)−1 | |||||||
−1.77% Tg(N)−1 | |||||||
−1.36% Tg(N)−1 | |||||||
−1.48% Tg(N)−1 |
|||||||
2050 | −0.293 | −0.311 | Hodnebrog et al. (2011) | SRES B1 | −1.61% Tg(N)−1 | ||
B1 ACARE | −1.48% Tg(N)−1 | ||||||
Hodnebrog et al. (2012) | SRES A1B | −1.22% Tg(N)−1 | |||||
Khodayari et al. (2014a) | AEDT Scenario1 | −1.88% Tg(N)−1 | |||||
AEDT Baseline | −1.59% Tg(N)−1 | ||||||
This studyc | RCP45 | −1.36% Tg(N)−1 |
this is an average of the last 10 years of simulations
the chemcial (τCH4+OH) lifetime is around 7% greater than the total CH4 lifetime, as modelled by TROPOS
numbers are based on transient simulation
numbers might not be very accurate as they are read directly from the graphs found in the respecitve papers