Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 7;12(8):2356. doi: 10.3390/nu12082356

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Results for the Association between District Policy on Nutrition Information for School Meals and Schools Routinely Providing Calorie/Nutrient Information for USDA-Reimbursable Meals.

Variable AOR (95% CI)
District policy on nutrition information for school meals
No policy/provision (Ref) 1.00 (1.00, 1.00)
Weak policy 2.22 (0.97, 5.07)
Strong policy 2.59 ** (1.33, 5.05)
Grade Levels Offered
Elementary (Ref) 1.00 (1.00, 1.00)
Middle 0.95 (0.69, 1.30)
High 0.76 (0.52, 1.10)
School Race
≥66% White (Ref) 1.00 (1.00, 1.00)
≥50% Black 1.33 (0.53, 3.31)
≥50% Hispanic 2.51 * (1.02, 6.20)
Other 1.97 * (1.06, 3.67)
Tertiles of % students eligible for FRPL
Low (≤37.42%) (Ref) 1.00 (1.00, 1.00)
Medium (>37.42–63.37%) 0.73 (0.45, 1.19)
High (>63.37%) 0.57 (0.27, 1.22)
Urbanicity
Urban (Ref) 1.00 (1.00, 1.00)
Suburban 0.69 (0.37, 1.30)
Rural 0.35 ** (0.17, 0.71)
School Size
Small (fewer than 500 students) 0.70 (0.41, 1.19)
Medium (500 to 999 students) 0.77 (0.47, 1.24)
Large (1000 or more students) (Ref) 1.00 (1.00, 1.00)
Census Region
West (Ref) 1.00 (1.00, 1.00)
Midwest 1.73 (0.82, 3.65)
South 2.60 ** (1.28, 5.28)
Northeast 1.08 (0.49, 2.35)
N of schools in analysis 1056
Adjusted prevalence of schools providing calorie/nutrition information for meals by district policy strength
No district policy on nutrition information for school meals 60.5%
Weak district policy on nutrition information for school meals 76.0%
Strong district policy on nutrition information for school meals 78.6%

* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; AOR: Adjusted odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Ref: referent category; FRPL: free/reduced-price lunch.