Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 26;12(8):2231. doi: 10.3390/nu12082231

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of study participants.

Characteristics NG
(n= 15)
HIIT
(n= 14)
RT
(n= 12)
CT
(n= 14)
p Value
Anthropometric parameters
Age, years 41.2 (7.6) 43.6 (7.2) 38.7 (6.0) 39.2 (6.8) 0.237
Body mass, kg 82.4 (16.4) 75.1 (10.8) 84.2 (11.5) 77.2 (23.1) 0.169
Body mass index, kg/m2 29.3 (3.9) 29.7 (2.7) 31.3 (3.7) 30.2 (3.8) 0.531
Waist circumference, cm 95.1 (12.4) 90.0 (8.6) 94.7 (8.3) 91.2 (7.3) 0.367
Educational level, n (%)a
High school 2 (13) 1 (13) 2 (17) 1 (7) 0.188
Technician 8 (53) 5 (36) 0 (0) 4 (27)
University 5 (33) 8 (57) 10 (83) 9 (64)
Level of occupation, n (%)a
Full timer 7 (47) 7 (44) 8 (50) 10 (71) 0.495
Half timer 1 (7) 2 (13) 0 (0) 1 (7)
Independent 5 (33) 5 (31) 2 (13) 3 (21)
Housewife 1 (7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Unemployed 1 (7) 0 (0) 2 (13) 0 (0)
Socioeconomic status, n (%)a
Low 1 (7) 1 (7) 2 (17) 1 (7) 0.651
Mid 14 (93) 13 (93) 8 (67) 11 (79)
High 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (17) 2 (14)
Caloric distribution by nutrients
Daily caloric intake, mean (SD) 1441 (471) 1595 (279) 1791 (439) 1811 (439) 0.060
Protein, % 19.8 (5.1) 17.4 (5.5) 18.2 (4.2) 18.4 (3.1) 0.221
Fat, % 37.7 (7.7) 35.4 (3.6) 38.1 (5.5) 35.2 (5.6) 0.435
Carbohydrate, % 42.7 (8.0) 47.3 (8.4) 43.7 (5.6) 46.8 (8.4) 0.195

Continuous variables are reported as mean values (standard deviations (SD) and categorical variables are reported as numbers and (%)a. Body mass index was calculated with the following formula = body weight (kg)/height squared (m2). To compare groups, ANOVA was applied from quantitative variables, while for the qualitative variables, the Chi-square test was used.