Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 4;11(8):502. doi: 10.3390/insects11080502

Table 2.

Electroscutumography (ESG) responses of intact ticks (N = 21) to a series of attractant VOCs. Responses are displayed as marginal means and 95% confidence intervals estimated from a model that included tick number as a random factor to account for repeated measurements of each individual. The responses were log-transformed before the model and post-hoc tests, and here we display back-transformed estimates on the original scaled measurement (in mV).

VOC Number of Carbons 1 Functional Groups mV 95% CI Tukey’s
2n-Hexane 6 SH 2.0 (1.2, 3.3) a
Pentanal 5 SH; A 1.8 (1.1, 2.9) a
Octanal 8 SH; A 1.8 (1.1, 3.0) a
Lactic acid 3 SH; CA; H 2.1 (1.3, 3.4) a
Heptanal 7 SH; A 2.6 (1.6, 4.3) a
Hexanal 6 SH; A 5.0 (3.1, 8.1) b
NH3 - - 6.5 (4.0, 10.6) bc
Hexanoic acid 6 SH; CA 6.6 (4.1, 10.8) bc
Butanal 4 SH; A 8.4 (5.1, 13.6) c
Isovaleric acid 5 SH; CA 13.8 (8.5, 22.6) d
Isobutyric acid 4 SH; CA 18.3 (11.2, 29.9) de
Butyric acid 4 SH; CA 18.5 (11.3, 30.2) de
Propionic acid 3 SH; CA 26.4 (16.1, 43.0) e

1 A = aldehyde (-COH); H = hydroxyl (-OH); CA = carboxylic acid (-COOH); SH = saturated hydrocarbon. 2 Three hexane (control) puffs were presented at the beginning, middle, and end of each series of recordings, and the results were averaged for each tick.