Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;11(8):540. doi: 10.3390/insects11080540

Table 4.

Repellence of Sitophilus zeamais due to treatment of stored maize with α-pinene, 3-carene and Poudrox®.

Product Concentration (ppm) Repellence (%) Class Interpretation
α-Pinene Control (5%) 24.31 ± 9.17 A II Low repellence
1 41.84 ± 4.48 AB III Moderately repellent
2 57.43 ± 7.09 B IV Repellent
3 57.62 ± 3.01 B IV Repellent
4 68.04 ± 5.27 B IV Repellent
F (4,15) 7.617 **
3-Carene Control (5%) 24.31 ± 9.17 B II Low repellence
1 4.41 ± 5.18 A I Very low repellence
2 35.00 ± 6.66 B III Moderately repellent
3 60.00 ± 7.07 C IV Repellent
4 66.39 ± 5.45 C IV Repellent
F (4,15) 27.481 ***

Means ± S.E. in the same column for the same category of insecticide, followed by the same letter do not differ significantly at p = 0.05 (Tukey test). Each datum represents the mean of four replicates of 20 insects each. **: very significant (p < 0.001); ***: very highly significant (p < 0.0001); Control (5%): Poudrox.