Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med. 2020 Feb 13;133(7):e343–e354. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.12.053

Appendix Table 1.

The adjusted association between extended duration shifts and adverse safety outcomes stratified by cohort.

Extended Duration Shifts (EDS) 2002–2007 Extended Duration Shifts (EDS) 2014–2017
None 1–4 ≥5 p-value None 1–4 ≥5 p-value
Crashes Ref 1.20 (0.94-1.54) 1.46 (1.17-1.81) 0.002 Ref 0.98 (0.65-1.49) 2.02 (1.36-3.01) 0.03
Crashes leaving work Ref non-estimable Ref 1.05 (0.56-
1.96)
1.64 (0.83-
3.23)
0.51
Near-crashes Ref 1.48 (1.35-1.62) 1.95 (1.79-2.12) <0.0001 Ref 1.20 (1.01-1.43) 1.45 (1.19-1.76) 0.0022
Occupational Exposures^ Ref 1.11 (0.96-1.27) 1.17 (1.03-1.33) 0.05 Ref 1.44 (1.16-1.79) 1.35 (1.02-1.79) 0.0046
Percutaneous Injuries^ Ref 0.97 (0.80-1.19) 1.07 (0.89-1.29) 0.53 Ref 1.50 (1.10-2.06) 1.29 (0.85-1.97) 0.07
Attentional Failures Ref 1.59 (1.51-1.69) 2.21 (2.09-2.33) <0.0001 Ref 1.37 (1.25-1.49) 1.71(1.51-1.93) <0.0001

All models are adjusted for age, gender, BMI, specialty, and cohort. P-values are obtained from likelihood ratio tests.

^

Also adjusted for hours of patient care in the month.