Table 3.
Authors | Prevalence of IFG n (%) | Cognitive test | Cognitive changes Mean (SE); p Value |
---|---|---|---|
Marseglia et al. [10] | 947/ 2746 (34,5 %) |
MMSE | −0.06 (-0.10 to −0.02); <0.01 |
Rouch et al. [7] | 26/163 (15.9%) | FCSR | −0.01 (0.10); 0.37 −0.03 (0.15); 0.89 0.03 (0.40); 0.49 0.01 (0.13); 0.31 |
BVRT | −0.01 (0.12); 0.76 | ||
TMT A | 0.17 (0.38); 0.24 | ||
TMT B | 0.09 (0.29); 0.77 | ||
DSST | −0.02 (0.15); 0.39 | ||
Stroop | 0.07 (0.20); 0.06 | ||
Category Fluency Test | 0.02 (0.18); 0.77 | ||
Letter Fluency Test | −0.01 (0.19); 0.02 | ||
Samaras et al. [8] | 346/1037 33.3% | WAIS III | Change reported in Z-scores: Global cognition −0.23 (0.04); 0.84 Processing Speed −0.12 (0.05); 0.10 Memory −0.15 (0.04); 0.79 Language −0.24 (0.05); 0.89 Visuospatial performance −0.07 (0.04); 0.94 Executive function −0.26 (0.06); 0.50 |
TMT A | |||
TMT B | |||
Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test | |||
Logical Memory Story A | |||
BVRT | |||
Category Fluency Test | |||
The Boston Naming Test | |||
Letter Fluency Test | |||
Xu et al. [9] | In cognitively intact cohort 30/877 (3.4%), In MCI cohort 16/268 (6%) |
MMSE | Incidental dementia in cognitively intact cohort 7/30 (23.3%); p 0.274 Incidental MCI in cognitively intact cohort 6/30 (21.1%) p 0.220 Incidental dementia in MCI cohort 7/16 (38.9%) p 0.221 |