Table 5.
Systematic review of the association between T2D and Category fluency tests and changes of cognition.
| Authors | T2D at intake N (%) |
Cognitive test | Cognitive status Mean (SE) |
Cognitive changes Mean (SE) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-DM | DM | p Value | Non-DM | DM | p Value | |||
| Bangen et al. [13] | 378 (25.3%) | Category fluency | 14.8 ± 4.3 | 13.8 ± 4.0 | <0.001 | 13.0 ± 4.4 | 12.2 ± 4.1 | 0.007 |
| Espeland et al. [16] | n = 179 (8.3%) | Category fluency | 29.04 (6.24) | 27.77 (6.24) | 0.009 | – | – | |
| Okereke et al. [18] | n (men) = 553 (9.4%) n (women) = 405 (6.4%) |
Category fluency | 2.7 ± 2.0 3.0 ± 2.1 |
2.4 ± 2.1 2.7 ± 2.0 |
– | - - |
- - |
|
| Rouch et al. [7] | 12 (7%) | Category fluency | 28.9 (7.75) | 31.7 (7.63) | 0.21 | 0.01 (0.23) | −0.11 (0.20) | 0.09 |
| Samaras et al. [8] | 106 (12%) | Category fluency (Z-score) | −1.23 (0.15) | −0.93 (0.15) | 0.21 | −0.95 (0.06) | −0.71 (0.06) | 0.46 |