Table 6.
Systematic review of the association between T2D and BVRT and changes of cognition.
| Authors | T2D at intake N (%) |
Cognitive test | Cognitive status Mean (SE) |
Cognitive changes Mean (SE) |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-DM | DM | p Value | Non-DM | DM | p Value | |||
| Bangen et al. [13] | 378 (25.3%) | BVRT Recognition Matching |
7.0 (2.2) 8.7 (1.8) |
6.6 (2.2) 8.3 (2.0) |
0.20 0.18 |
6.8 (2.3) 8.5 (1.8) |
6.3 (2.3) 8.0 (2.0) |
0.001 <.001 |
| Espeland et al. [16] | 179 (8.3%) | BVRT | 7.06 (3.71) | 7.78 (4.48) | 0.02 | – | 0.16 (0.07) | 0.02 |
| Rouch et al. [7] | 12 (7%) | BVRT | 12.80 (1.66) | 12.06 (2.50) | 0.14 | 0.00 (0.16) | 0.07 (0.27) | 0.15 |
| Samaras et al. [8] | 106 (12%) | BVRT (z-score) | −0.92 (0.15) | −1.23 (0.17) | 0.21 | −0.71 (0.06) | −0.95 (0.06) | 0.18 |