Table 9.
Authors | T2D at intake N (%) |
Cognitive test | Cognitive status Mean (SE) |
Cognitive changes Mean (SE) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-DM | DM | p Value | Non-DM | DM | p Value | |||
Espeland et al. [16] | 179 (8.3%) | Digit Span Forward Digit Span Backward |
7.45 (2.09) 6.67 (2.02) |
7.33 (1.87) 6.72 (2.09) |
0.45 0.73 |
Change in cognition adjusted for all risk factors, attention/working memory 0.04 (0.07) p 0.56 | ||
Hassing et al. [21] | 36 (13.1%) | Digit Span Forward Digit Span Backward |
5.5 ± 1.2 3.5 ± 1.6 |
5.5 +/. 1.4 3.5 ± 1.2 |
−0.10 (0.2) −0.11 (0.02) |
−0.02 (0.04) −0.08 (0.05) |
<0.05 <0.05 |
|
Logroscino et al. [17] | 1394 (7.3%) | Digit span Backwards | 6.7 (2.4) | 6.4 (2.4) | The change was reported in global cognition score |