Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 3;15(9):e0238301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238301

Table 1. Permeability of an in vitro BBB model to immunoglobulins and sucrose.

Permeability, median (IQR) Control-IgG NMO-IgG1 NMOIgG2 NMO-IgG3 p-value(Kruskal Wallis)
IgG (ul.hr -1. cm-2) 0.54 (0.35–0.73) 0.98 (0.54–1.45) 1.22 (1.12–1.75)* 1.17 (0.30–1.18) 0.238
Sucrose (ul.min -1. cm-2) 0.31 (0.29–0.34) 0.42 (0.36–0.51)* 0.44 (0.41–0.48)* 0.39 (0.33–0.39) 0.042

*p = 0.050 vs. Control IgG

Abbreviation; IQR, interquartile range

BMEC were exposed to three different NMO-IgG (2 mg/ml) in the upper compartment of the culture system simulating blood. The basolateral side simulates the CSF. NMO-IgG2 clearance rate was twice that of the Control-IgG, p = 0.050. When exposing cells to the NMO-IgG or control-IgG, the sucrose clearance rate in cells treated with NMO-IgG1 and NMO-IgG2 was significantly higher than in those treated with Control-IgG, p = 0.050)