. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 1;59(11):1252–1263.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.07.938

Table 3:

Summary of Goodness of Fit Statistics for the Tested Best Fitting Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM) Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Model Across Normative and Clinical Samples, Age, Gender and Language Level

	χ²	CFI	TLI	RMSEA (90%CI)	SRMR	AIC	BIC	corBIC
Whole Sample	11059.798^**	.973	.961	.042 (.042; .043)	.016	1615221.613	1616449.834	1615973.137
Clinical Sample	8676.615^**	.944	.920	.046 (.045; .047)	.023	1121834.557	1123000.033	1122523.342
Unaffected Siblings	2211.598^**	.962	.946	.036 .035; .038)	.019	283218.339	284238.039	283761.376
Normative Sample	943.404^**	.958	.939	.036 (.033; 038)	.021	121600.055	122471.669	121995.082
Feale Sex/Gender	2914.499^**	.976	.965	.042 (.041; .044)	.015	385413.762	386433.008	385956.346
Male Sex/Gender	7658.034^**	.965	.950	.044 (.043; .045)	.018	1064468.165	1065629.549	1065152.858
Age Group 1^a	3119.032^**	.967	.953	.044 (.043; .046)	.018	401071.695	402089.572	401612.910
Age Group 2^b	5044.689^**	.971	.958	.043 (.042; .044)	.017	702580.925	703683.388	703206.706
Age Group 3^c	2380.662^**	.973	.961	.043 (.041; .044)	.016	321368.835	322353.218	321876.567
No Functional Language	748.870^**	.964	.949	.035 (.032; .038)	.020	116387.464	117216.714	116740.167
Functional Language	5322.038^**	.975	.965	.042 (.041; .043)	.015	766863.586	767984.527	767507.842

Note: AIC= Akaike Information Criterion; BIC= Bayesian Information Criterion; CFA= Confirmatory Factor; CFI= Comparative Fit Index; corBIC= Sample size adjusted BIC; ESEM= Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling; RDoC= Research Domain Criteria; RMSEA= Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR= Standardized Root Mean Square Residual; TLI= Tucker-Lewis Index.

Group 1: 2–6 years of age.

Group 2: 7–12 years of age.

Group 3: 13–18 years of age.

p< .01;

^**

p< .001