Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 10;11(9):2473–2482. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13558

Figure 2.

Figure 2

In vitro effects of CEACAM6 expression on DDP resistance. (a) Lentiviral vector‐meditated siRNA to knock down CEACAM6 expression in A549/DDP cells with or without miRNA inhibitors; *P < 0.05 vs. A549, **P < 0.05 vs. A549‐siCEACAM6. (b) CEACAM6 overexpression vector was transfected into A549 cells with or without miRNA mimics; *P < 0.05 vs. A549/DDP, **P < 0.05 vs. A549/DDP‐CEACAM6. (c) Cell proliferation (Inline graphic) Si NC (Inline graphic) SiCEACAM6* (Inline graphic) SiCEACAM6+ miR146a inhibitor ** (Inline graphic) SiCEACAM6+ miR26a inhibitor ** (Inline graphic) Vector (Inline graphic) CEACAM6* (Inline graphic) CEACAM6+ miR146a mimic ** (Inline graphic) CEACAM6+ miR26a mimic ** (d) the IC50 values of DDP were analyzed using a cell counting kit‐8 (CCK‐8) assay (Inline graphic) Si NC (IC50 = 29.08) (Inline graphic) SiCEACAM6 (IC50=6.212) * (Inline graphic) SiCEACAM6+ miR146a inhibitor (IC50 = 22.65) ** (Inline graphic) SiCEACAM6+ miR26a inhibitor (IC50 = 20.43) ** (Inline graphic) Vector (IC50 = 5.932) (Inline graphic) CEACAM6 (IC50 = 20.26) * (Inline graphic) CEACAM6+ miR146a mimic (IC50 = 8.685) ** (Inline graphic) CEACAM6+ miR26a mimic (IC50 = 10.21) ** . (e) Cell migration and invasion were determined by transwell and wound healing assays (Inline graphic) migration (Inline graphic) invasion (Inline graphic) migration (Inline graphic) invasion.