Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;29(15):2625–2636. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddaa103

Table 1.

Correlation analyses between IGF-II, IGFBP-5 and other variables and regression with height and BMI

Variable IGFBP-5 Free IGF-Ia Total IGF-Ia Intact IGFBP-3 Total IGFBP-3 PAPP-A2a Free/total IGF-Ia Height z-score BMI z-score
Males
 IGF-II (N = 405) r P value −0.10 (0.05) −0.15 (0.003) 0.07 (0.17) 0.17 (0.0006) 0.53 (<0.0001) 0.02 (0.65) −0.19 (0.0002) −0.015 (0.77) −0.007 (0.89)
 IGFBP-5 (N = 405) r P value 0.39 (<0.0001) 0.44 (<0.0001) 0.32 (<0.0001) 0.008 (0.87) −0.14 (0.004) −0.009 (0.86) 0.12 (0.02) −0.02 (0.71)
Females
 IGF-II (N = 431) r P value 0.07 (0.13) 0.06 (0.22) −0.05 (0.27) 0.04 (0.57) 0.51 (<0.0001) 0.12 (0.02) 0.10 (0.03) −0.028 (0.56) −0.045 (0.35)
 IGFBP-5 (N = 431) r P value 0.41 (<0.0001) 0.51 (<0.0001) 0.32 (<0.0001) 0.18 (0.0001) −0.10 (0.04) −0.04 (0.37) 0.04 (0.37) −0.029 (0.55)

aThe natural log-transformation was used for statistical analysis of free and total IGF-I, PAPP-A2 and free/total IGF-I ratio.

Note: Bivariate Pearson correlation analyses were performed. The r means the Pearson correlation coefficient. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.