Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 3;10:14613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71577-8

Table 4.

Patient characteristics in “IRT” vs. “NIRT” groups.

All patients (%) Inguinal RT “IRT (%) No inguinal “NIRT” (%)
Patients 80 (100) 54 (68) 26 (32)
Male 32 (40) 22 (41) 10 (38)
Female 48 (60) 32 (59) 16 (62)
Localization
Anal canal 56 (70) 37 (68) 19 (73)
Anal canal + rectal 12 (15) 8 (15) 4 (15)
Anal canal + margin 12 (15) 9 (17) 3 (12)
T1 14 (17) 8 (15) 6 (23)
T2 30 (38) 17 (32) 13 (50)
T3 24 (30) 18 (33) 6 (23)
T4 12 (15) 11 (20) 1 (4)
N0 29 (36) 15 (28) 14 (54)
N1 17 (21) 11 (20) 6 (23)
N2 14 (18) 12 (22) 2 (8)
N3 20 (25) 16 (30) 4 (15)
M0 73 (91) 48 (89) 25 (96)
M1 7 (9) 6 (11) 1 (4)
Positive PET/negative PET 0/49 18/30 2/19
Positive SLNB/negative SLBN 12/34 12/13 0/21
3DCRT 24 (30) 14 (26%) 10 (39)
Tomotherapy 18 (23) 14 (26%) 4 (15)
VMAT 38 (47) 26 (48) 12 (46)

PET: positron emission tomography; SLBN: sentinel lymph-node biopsy; TP: true positive; TN: true negative; FP: false positive; FN: false negative; VMAT: volumetric modulated arc therapy; IRT: inguinal RT; NIRT: non inguinal RT.