Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 29;6(8):e04811. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04811

Table 5.

Risk estimation in CM patients using clinical factors. N represents no. of samples for which data was available.

Factor Strata N HR p value
Age >63y vs 63y 449 1.83 4 × 10−4
continuous 449 1.02 1.9 × 10−6
AJCC 6th ed. Stage III, IV vs I,II 138 1.60 0.071
AJCC 7th ed. Stage III, IV vs I,II 215 2.26 0.025
N staging N1, N2, N3 vs N0 396 1.82 9 × 10−4
T staging T2, T3, T4 vs Tis, T1 378 1.68 4.8 × 10−2
M staging M1 vs M0 423 1.90 9.9 × 10−2
Breslow thickness >3mm vs 3mm 342 2.45 3 × 10−6
continuous 342 1.03 10−4
Gender Male vs Female 449 1.20 0.277
Ulceration status Yes vs No 300 2.06 5 × 10−4