Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 17;18(3):194–205. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1750864

Table 3.

Clinical studies using other types of stem cells, HUCBs and TNCs.

Reference Patients, n
Stem cell type
Mean follow-up, months Continent (no pads), and improvement
(1–2 pads), n/N (%)
Injection site
Periurethral injection rhabdosphincter
or
submucosa
(o’clock positions)
Clinical evaluation Functional outcomes
Lee et al., 2010 [30] 39 Females only 36 completed follow-up Heterologous HUCBs 1, 3,12 13/36 (36) continent
13/36 (36) improvement
10/36 (27) persistent SUI
4,8 MUCP MUCP/PVR
1-h pad test/cough test/ICIQ-UI/ICIQ-QOL
Shirvan et al., 2013 [31] 9 Females TNCs/platelets 1, 3, 6 8/9 improvement
1/9 persistent SUI
1.5, 3, 4.5, 6, 7.5, 9, 12 MUCP ↑ (~25 cmH2O) ↑ MUCP (from <30 cmH2O)

ICIQ-(QOL)(UI): International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (Quality of life) (Urinary Incontinence); MUCP: maximum urethral closure pressure; PVR: post-void residual urine volume.