Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 18;2:41–44. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2019.12.002

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

A. Panelist's ranking score when using Bubble Sorting, Merge Sorting, or an un-cued sorting strategy. Ranking scores of 1.0 imply a perfect ordering, with 0 a complete reversal, i.e. sorted from strongest to weakest. Columns show mean plus SEM, columns with differing letters imply statistical differences. B. Panelist's perceived level of difficulty from the Bubble Sorting, Merge Sorting, and an un-cued sorting strategies, where 1 implies very easy, and 5 implies very difficult. Columns show mean plus SEM, columns with differing letters imply statistical differences. C. Panelist's time to complete the sorting tasks when following a Bubble Sorting, Merge Sorting, or un-cued sorting strategy. Y axis denotes time taken for ordering 6 samples in seconds. Columns show mean plus SEM, columns with differing letters imply statistical differences.