Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 6;20(6):731–741. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30755-8

Table 3.

Outcomes in patients with CRE infections.

CPE (n=253) Non-CP-CRE (n=102) U-CRE (n=94) All (n=449) P value
DOOR at 30 days n/ad
alive without events 106 (42) 37 (36) 40 (43) 183 (41)
alive with 1 event 53 (21) 26 (25) 18 (19) 97 (22)
alive with 2 or 3 events 31 (12) 17 (17) 14 (15) 62 (14)
dead 63 (25) 22 (22) 22 (23) 107 (24)
DOOR components at 30 daysa
not discharged 103 (41) 45 (44) 36 (38) 184 (41) 0·70
readmitted 32 (13) 12 (12) 14 (15) 58 (13) 0·79
lack of clinical response 86 (34) 35 (34) 32 (34) 153 (34) >0·99
lack of symptomatic response 74 (29%) 29 (28) 28 (30) 131 (29) 0·98
relapse 12 (5) 3 (3) 3 (3) 18 (4) 0·66
remains on anti-CRE antibiotic 8 (3) 9 (9) 7 (7) 24 (5) 0·06
renal failure 13 (5) 5 (5) 5 (5) 23 (5) 0·99
C. difficile infection 3 (1) 2 (2) 0 (0) 5 (1) 0·42
LOS, days, median (IQR) 19 (9, 38) 29 (12, 60) 15 (6, 35) 20 (8, 45) 0·002
Post-culture LOS, days, median (IQR) 11 (5, 22) 16 (6, 26) 10 (4, 19) 12 (5, 23) 0·02
30-day mortality 63 (25) 22 (22) 22 (23) 107 (24) 0·80
90-day mortality 79 (31) 33 (32) 25 (27) 137 (31) 0·64
90-day readmissionsb 81/183 (44%) 37/69 (54%) 32/73 (44%) 150/325 (46%) 0·37
clinical response 167 (66%) 67 (66%) 62 (66%) 296 (66%) >0·99
Dispositionc 0·03
death 63 (25) 27 (26) 19 (20) 109 (24)
home 72 (28) 38 (37) 40 (43) 150 (33)
hospice 7 (3) 6 (6) 2 (2) 15 (3)
long term acute care 29 (11) 7 (7) 2 (2) 38 (8)
long term care 71 (28) 21 (21) 24 (26) 116 (26)
transfer other hospital 11 (4) 3 (3) 6 (6) 20 (4)
transferred to a foreign country 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1) 1 (<1)
a

Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) analysis components as defined in Supplementary Materials.

b

in patients discharged alive. LOS length of hospital stay.

c

Grouped for analysis purposes as death/hospice, home/transferred to a foreign country, LTAC/transfer other hospital, long-term care.

d

Inverse probability weighted (IPW) DOOR analyses indicated no significant differences between groups. IPW-adjusted probabilities of a patient with CPE vs. non-CP-CRE, CPE vs. U-CRE, non-CP-CRE vs U-CRE having a better outcome are 52% (95% CI 45%–58%), 52% (95% CI 44%–61%), 51% (95% CI 41%–60%). CPE: carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Non-CP-CRE: non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). U-CRE: unconfirmed CRE.