Table 1.
Gene List | NGenes | E.S. | Direction | p Value | FDR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HALLMARK_GLYCOLYSIS | 239 | 2.1 | Up | 5.56 × 10−6 | 1.90 × 10−5 |
HALLMARK_OXIDATIVE_PHOSPHORYLATION | 227 | 2.3 | Up | 0.00048225 | 0.000618 |
HALLMARK_INFLAMMATORY_RESPONSE | 244 | 3.5 | Up | 2.87 × 10−6 | 1.26 × 10−5 |
GO_POSITIVE_REGULATION_OF_CYTOKINE_PRODUCTION | 448 | 2.5 | Up | 8.08 × 10−7 | 6.63 × 10−6 |
KEGG_OXIDATIVE_PHOSPHORYLATION | 120 | 2.4 | Up | 0.00100761 | 0.001087 |
GO_MITOCHONDRIAL_MEMBRANE_ORGANIZATION | 119 | 1.6 | Up | 1.08 × 10−5 | 2.77 × 10−5 |
GO_MITOCHONDRIAL_TRANSLATION | 111 | 2.6 | Up | 0.00020051 | 0.00027403 |
GO_MITOCHONDRIAL_TRANSMEMBRANE_TRANSPORT | 69 | 2.1 | Up | 0.0001381 | 0.00020221 |
GO_MITOCHONDRIAL_TRANSPORT | 212 | 1.5 | Up | 6.87 × 10−5 | 0.00011741 |
GO_PROTEIN_LOCALIZATION_TO_MITOCHONDRION | 82 | 1.6 | Up | 3.96 × 10−5 | 7.37 × 10−5 |
GO_MITOCHONDRIAL_PROTEIN_COMPLEX | 133 | 2.6 | Up | 0.00237101 | 0.00243029 |
GO_POSITIVE_REGULATION_OF_MITOCHONDRION_ORGANIZATION | 182 | 1.3 | Up | 4.92 × 10−6 | 1.83 × 10−5 |
GO_PROTEIN_TARGETING_TO_MITOCHONDRION | 60 | 1.8 | Up | 9.41 × 10−5 | 0.00015427 |
PPARGC1A_TARGET_GENE_LIST | 24 | 1.7 | Up | 0.00013528 | 0.00020221 |
GO_GLUTAMINE_FAMILY_AMINO_ACID_METABOLIC_PROCESS | 55 | 1.9 | Up | 0.00011041 | 0.000174 |
GO_CELLULAR_RESPONSE_TO_FATTY_ACID | 70 | 2.7 | Up | 5.46 × 10−7 | 6.63 × 10−6 |
GO_PYRUVATE_METABOLIC_PROCESS | 53 | 2.0 | Up | 4.99 × 10−5 | 8.90 × 10−5 |
NGenes, number of genes; E.S, enrichment score; FDR, false discovery rate.
FRY statistical test results to determine the level of enrichment of various gene sets in NK cells from infected mice versus uninfected controls. Enrichment of different gene sets was determined in NK cells from mice following L. monocytogenes infection compared with uninfected controls, and table shows the number of genes in each gene set, the direction of the enrichment in terms of genes demonstrating upregulation or downregulation after infection, as well as the p value and false discovery rate obtained from applying the FRY variant of the rotational gene set test for differential expression analysis (Wu et al., 2010).