Table 3.
Sensor type | Viruses | Analytical data | Samples | Detection speed | Interferents | Detection medium | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Polymeric nanoparticles coated with streptavidin dye | SARS-CoV-2 |
LOD: 12 copies Sensitivity: 100% (33/33) Specificity: 100% (96/96) |
Oropharynx swab | 60 min for the whole diagnosis | Absence of cross reactions | Colorimetric | [122] |
Lanthanide-doped polysterene nanoparticles | SARS-CoV-2 |
Was used to test seven samples that were positive by RT-PCR and 12 that were negative Results of this assay: 8 positive and 11 negative |
Blood serum | 10 min | – | Fluorimetric | [123] |
Poly (amino ester) with carboxyl groups coated magnetic nanoparticles (pcMNP) | SARS-CoV-2 |
LOD: 10 copies Linear range: 10–105 copies |
Pseudovirus samples diluted in foetal calf serum | 20 min for purification + subsequent RT-PCR reactions | Some signal amplifications in negative controls, although about 40 delayed cycles of a valid positive result | Direct RT-PCR | [116] |
Gold nanoparticles | SARS-CoV-2 |
Sensitivity: 88.66% (352/397) Specificity: 90.63% (116/128) |
Venous blood and finger prick | 15 min | – | Colorimetric | [114] |
Gold nanoislands | SARS-CoV-2 |
LOD: 0.22 pmol/L Linear range: 0.1 pmol/L–1 μmol/L Recovery rate: 26/5000 96% in mixing sample. |
Synthetic oligonucleotides | – | – | Interferometry | [124] |
Zinc ferrite nanoparticles | SARS-CoV-2 | – | – |
15 min Extract the viral RNA through automation process + subsequent RT-PCR reactions |
– | Direct RT-PCR | [125] |
Nanopore target sequencing (NTS) | SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory viruses simultaneously |
LOD: 10 copies Linear range: 10–3000 copies Specificity: 100% (5/5) |
Oropharyngeal swabs | 6–10 h | – | qPCR | [126] |
Spike (S) protein specific nanoplasmonic resonance sensor | SARS-CoV-2 |
Linear range: 103 virus particle/mL–106 virus particle/mL LOD: 750 vp/mL |
Pseudovirus diluted in bovine serum albumin (BSA) | 15 min | – | Colorimetric | [127] |