Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 24;40(9):963–967. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.176

Table 1.

Scores on Individual Cognitive and Behavioral Constructs, Guideline Acceptance, and Knowledge Score by Site and Overalla

Site Self-Efficacy, Mean (SD) Behavior, Mean (SD) Social Norms, Mean (SD) Risk Perception, Mean (SD) Guideline Acceptance, Mean (SD) Knowledge Score, Mean (SD)
Ann Arbor 4.1 (0.6) 3.2 (1.0) 2.7 (0.9) 3.7 (0.7) 4.3 (0.7) 82.0 (19.0)
Minneapolis 3.8 (0.7) 2.9 (1.0) 2.8 (0.8) 3.6 (0.6) 4.3 (0.6) 83.2 (15.8)
Greater LA 3.9 (0.7) 2.5 (1.0) 2.6 (0.9) 3.4 (0.7) 4.5 (0.7) 75.7 (19.2)
Miami 4.0 (0.7) 2.8 (1.1) 2.7 (0.9) 3.5 (0.7) 4.4 (0.6) 73.6 (21.2)
Total 4.2 (0.8) 3.4 (1.1) 2.9 (1.0) 3.8 (0.7) 4.2 (0.8) 77.7 (19.4)

Note. SD, standard deviation.

a

Individual response options were strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree, and don’t know. “Don’t know” answers were excluded. Examples of the behavioral construct questions include self-efficacy, eg, “I feel confident that I know how to manage bacteriuria”; behavior, eg, “I usually prescribe antibiotics to treat catheter-associated bacteriuria in patients who have pyuria”; social norms, eg,”the other clinicians I work with usually treat patients with urinary catheters and a positive urine culture with antimicrobial agents”; and risk perceptions, eg, “asymptomatic bacteriuria requires treatment more often in geriatric patients than in younger patients.”