Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug;9(4):1841–1852. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.29

Table 1. Comparison of outcomes of nephroureterectomy by technique.

Author Time-frame Technique Number of patients Median follow-up (months) 5-yr recurrence free survival (%) 5-yr cancer specific survival rate (%) Notes
Capitanio et al. 1987–2007 ONU 979 73 76.2 73.1 Patients who underwent LNU were older but had more favorable pathologic staging and less LVI. After adjustment for tumor stage, no significant difference in RFS or CSS based on technique
LNU 270 31 86.8 85.8
Walton et al. 1987–2008 ONU 703 36 73.7 63.4 Patients who underwent LNU were more likely to have renal pelvis tumors, received adjuvant chemotherapy and higher grade tumors. After adjustments, no significant difference in RFS or CSS based on technique
LNU 70 17 75.4 75.2
Simone et al. 2003–2006 ONU 40 44 77.4 89.9 Prospective randomized study demonstrating less mean blood loss and time to discharge with LNU. Overall, no difference in RFS and CSS but in patients with ≥ pT3 tumors, CSS and RFS were in favor of ONU
LNU 40 44 72.5 79.8
Lim et al. 2007–2010 RANU 32 45 68.1 75.8 No comparison with ONU
Aboumohamed et al. 2008–2014 RANU 65 25 57.1 69.5 No comparison with ONU
De Groote et al. (29) 2008–2017 RANU 78 15 53 (4-yr) Not reported 4-yr overall survival of 66%

ONU, open nephroureterectomy; LNU, laparoscopic nephroureterectomy; RANU, robotic assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy; LVI, lymphovascular invasion; RFS, recurrence free survival; CSS, cancer specific survival.