Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 11;30(3):425–431. doi: 10.1089/thy.2019.0190

Table 5.

Comparison of the Risk of Malignancy in BSRTC Categories and by Degree of Hürthle Cell Presence Between (A) Multi-Institutional FNA Cohort (All FNAs with All Patients Going to Surgery)* Results and (B) the Current Study (All FNAs with Hürthle Cell Change with All Patients Going to Surgery)

Diagnostic category A. ROM in all FNAs (n = 1827), % B. ROM in Hürthle cell FNAs (n = 300), % p Degree of Hürthle cell presence (n = 203)
Mild, n (ROM %) p Moderate, n (ROM %) p Predominant, n (ROM %) p
I. Nondiagnostic 25.3 7.1 0.138 3 (0) 0.32 0 (0) N/A 6 (16.7) 0.64
II. Benign 9.3 7.1 0.464 50 (4) 0.21 6 (0) 0.434 11 (27.3) 0.048
III. AUS/FLUS 31.2 15.2 0.054 4 (0) 0.179 3 (33.3) 0.938 19 (21.1) 0.352
IV. FN/SFN 33.2 20.8 0.011 2 (0) 0.32 1 (0) 0.48 91 (18.7) 0.01
V. SM 82.6 50 0.006 0 (0) N/A 3 (33.3) 0.029 3 (66.7) 0.474
VI. Malignant 99.1 100 0.869 0 (0) N/A 0 (0) N/A 1 (100) 0.924
*

Faquin et al. (9).

The p-values were calculated with the two-tailed t-test; significance was set at <0.05.

N/A, not applicable.