Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 7.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2008 Feb 20;27(4):529–542. doi: 10.1002/sim.3002

Table I.

Comparison of results from different approaches for pooled analysis using the hierarchical Cox proportional hazards model.

MCMCid*
ieMCMC*
Bayesian-PL
Parameter Mean (SE) 95 per cent HDR Mean (SE) 95 per cent HDR Mean (SE) 95 per cent HDR
μ −0.797 (0.174) (−1.136, −0.475) −0.846 (0.208) (−1.248, −0.436) −0.891 (0.277) (−1.423, −0.335)
σ 0.327 (0.413) (0.027, 1.016) 0.425 (0.519) (0.029, 1.292) 0.727 (0.783) (0.028, 1.947)
γ1 −0.779 (0.145) (−1.067, −0.494) −0.845 (0.158) (−1.162, −0.544) −0.998 (0.185) (−1.360, −0.623)
γ2 −1.073 (0.359) (−1.812, −0.486) −1.227 (0.416) (−2.123, −0.596) −1.585 (0.476) (−2.497, −0.775)
γ3 −0.636 (0.274) (−1.111, −0.039) −0.623 (0.336) (−1.190, 0.109) −0.463 (0.412) (−1.189, 0.339)
β1 −0.538 (0.086) (−0.707, −0.371) −0.569 (0.098) (−0.756, −0.377) −0.645 (0.101) (−0.842, −0.444)
β2 0.013 (0.006) (0.001, 0.027) 0.017 (0.007) (0.002, 0.030) 0.008 (0.007) (−0.006, 0.021)
*

Random imputation for infection times y based on the estimated Weibull (α^,λ^).

Prior distribution for infection times y: Weibull(α, λ), where α ∼ LogNorm(1.31, 0.4) and λ ∼ LogNorm(3.51, 0.5).