Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 25;53(4):264–273. doi: 10.2141/jpsa.0150113

Table 5. Meat total antioxidant capacity (TAC), cholesterol and protein content of 42d old broilers.

Factors TAC (mmol TE/g)1
Cholesterol (mg/100 g)1
Protein content - Kjedahl (%)1
breast thigh thigh breast Thigh
Diet type (D)2
A 59.42 51.54 221.70 23.92A 21.45
B 59.18 48.11 190.79 23.57A 21.33
C 57.73 45.64 186.33 22.78B 20.86
Phytogenic (Ph)3
NO 53.62x 44.46x 206.43 23.53 21.16
YES 63.94y 52.40y 192.78 23.32 21.27
Interactions (treatments)
A 53.57 45.29 221.64 24.01 21.44
APh 65.27 57.79 221.76 23.83 21.46
B 56.45 45.87 197.87 23.59 21.37
BPh 61.91 50.35 174.79 23.56 21.30
C 50.83 42.22 199.79 23.00 20.68
CPh 64.64 49.05 181.79 22.56 21.04
SEM4 3.473 3.633 15.534 0.315 0.338
P-value
D 0.871 0.273 0.054 0.002 0.190
Ph 0.001 0.010 0.287 0.411 0.698
D×Ph 0.463 0.529 0.736 0.803 0.792
1

Data shown per diet type represent treatment means from n=20 broilers (e.g. 10 from treatment A+10 from treatment APh). Data shown for PFA represent means from n=30 replicate pens (e.g. A+B+C). Within the same column means with different superscript (A, B) per diet type and (x, y) per phytogenic, differ significantly (P<0.05).

2

Diet type (A, B and C): for each growth phase diet type A optimal for energy and protein; B and C suboptimal for protein and energy compared to A by 3 and 6% respectively.

3

Phytogenic supplementation (No=0 mg/kg diet and Yes=125 mg/kg diet).

4

Standard error of the means.