Table 1.

Summary of the statistics for gap distribution calculated based on the C2C and P2P criteria in the four case studies.

Landscape	C2C			P2P
	${\mu }_{C2C}$[m]	${\sigma }_{C2C}$[m]	CVC2C	${\mu }_{P2P}$[m]	${\sigma }_{P2P}$[m]	CVP2P
Synthetic	144	71	0.49	61	55	0.90
N. Dakota	151	73	0.48	60	57	0.95
Florida	148	87	0.59	75	73	0.96
Texas	915	426	0.47	346	319	0.92

Data shown are for comparison between the C2C and P2P gap distances with ${\mathrm{z}}_{\mathrm{gw}}={\mathrm{z}}_{\mathrm{tp}}$.