Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 31;6(8):e04803. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04803

Table 7.

Physician Rating of Potential Enablers for Guideline Adherence by Subgroups (N = 46): Share of responses rating the item as very often or frequently improving adherence.

Items very often or frequently rated as Enabler for Adherence Total Physician Type
Physician Role
NVL Knowledge
T2DM Experience
Recruitment
GP Specialist FET
p
Owner Assistant FET
p
Lower higher FET
p
≤10 years >10 years FET
p
BW Physicians DDG Physicians FET
p
N 46 9 37 36 10 3 42 8 38 25 21

E1 Appointment Reminder System 65% 78% 62% 0,463 67% 60% 0.720 33% 67% 0.285 63% 66% 1.000 64% 67% 1.000
E2 Patient Education 78% 78% 78% 1.000 72% 100% 0.089 67% 79% 0.539 88% 76% 0.664 84% 71% 0.475
E3 Physician Education 67% 89% 62% 0.235 64% 80% 0.460 33% 69% 0.254 88% 63% 0.243 56% 81% 0.115
E4 Alignment of Guideline and Reimbursement 70% 78% 68% 0.701 61% 100% 0.020 67% 69% 1.000 75% 68% 1.000 64% 76% 0.522
E5 Patient Financial Incentives 50% 67% 46% 0.459 50% 50% 1.000 67% 50% 1.000 88% 42% 0.047 56% 43% 0.554
E6 Cross-provider Collaboration 85% 89% 84% 1.000 83% 90% 1.000 100% 83% 1.000 100% 82% 0.325 84% 86% 1.000
E7 Electronic Therapy Decision Support 80% 78% 81% 1.000 78% 90% 0.659 67% 81% 0.497 88% 79% 1.000 88% 71% 0.264
E8 Real-time Guideline Deviation Tracking 59% 44% 62% 0.456 56% 70% 0.488 33% 60% 0.565 75% 55% 0.440 64% 52% 0.550
E9 Guideline Revision 70% 78% 68% 0.701 75% 50% 0.242 67% 69% 1.000 63% 71% 0.684 72% 67% 0.755

FET = Fisher's Exact Test, significant results in bold. The significance threshold for the p-values in italics is α ≤ 0.05.