. 2016 Apr 25;53(2):128–135. doi: 10.2141/jpsa.0150077

Table 6. Effect of dietary Flavomycin, Bacillus licheniformis and Enramycin supplementation on the cecal microflora of broilers (log₁₀ CFU g⁻¹ digesta).

	Control	FLV	FLC	ENR	SEM	P-value
Day 21
Lactobacillus	8.57^a	8.3^a	8.14^a	7.25^b	0.26	0.02
E. coli	7.14	6.60	5.94	5.82	0.38	0.09
Day 42
Lactobacillus	8.16^a	7.83^a	7.55^a	6.48^b	0.27	<0.01
E. coli	5.57^a	5.05^b	4.98^b	4.18^c	0.17	<0.01

Control: basal diet; FLV: basal diet+5 ppm Flavomycin; FLC: basal diet+5 ppm Flavomycin+1.35× 10⁹ CFU/kg Bacillus licheniformis; ENR: basal diet+5 ppm Enramycin.

^a–c

Means in the same row with different superscripts differ (P<0.05).

Table 6. Effect of dietary Flavomycin, Bacillus licheniformis and Enramycin supplementation on the cecal microflora of broilers (log10 CFU g−1 digesta).

Table 6. Effect of dietary Flavomycin, Bacillus licheniformis and Enramycin supplementation on the cecal microflora of broilers (log₁₀ CFU g⁻¹ digesta).