Table 4.
Body composition change from baseline by obesification group and time point during weight loss.
| Change from baseline | 4 weeks | 8 weeks | 12 weeks1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (kg) | |||
| ObN | −1.4 ± 0.6c,# | −2.7 ± 0.8c,$ | −3.6 ± 0.9c,$ |
| ObP | −0.4 ± 0.6a,# | −1.3 ± 1.0b,$ | −1.1 ± 1.2b,$ |
| WLD | −1.6 ± 0.5c,# | −2.3 ± 1.0c,# | −4.4 ± 1.1c,$ |
| IBW | −1.0 ± 0.6b,#,$ | −1.3 ± 0.8a,# | −0.6 ± 0.9a,$ |
| Fat mass (kg) | |||
| ObN | −1.2 ± 0.3b,c,# | −2.2 ± 0.4c,$ | −3.1 ± 0.6c,$ |
| ObP | −0.4 ± 0.5a,# | −0.8 ± 0.7a,# | −0.9 ± 1.0b,# |
| WLD | −1.5 ± 0.4c,# | −2.7 ± 0.8c,$ | −3.9 ± 0.8c,$ |
| IBW | −0.7 ± 0.3b,# | −1.0 ± 0.6b,# | −0.7 ± 0.7a,# |
| Body fat (%) | |||
| ObN | −3.4 ± 1.3a,b,# | −7.3 ± 1.7c,$ | −12.1 ± 3.7c,$ |
| ObP | −0.7 ± 1.0a,# | −2.4 ± 2.2a,# | −2.6 ± 3.2a,# |
| WLD | −5.2 ± 1.9b,# | −11.7 ± 3.2c,$ | −17.0 ± 4.8c,$ |
| IBW | −4.4 ± 2.3c,# | −6.6 ± 4.3b,# | −5.0 ± 4.7b,# |
| Lean mass (kg) | |||
| ObN | −0.5 ± 0.3b,# | −0.6 ± 0.5a,# | −0.6 ± 0.3b,# |
| ObP | −0.3 ± 0.3a,b,# | −0.3 ± 0.2a,# | −0.4 ± 0.3a,b,# |
| WLD | −0.4 ± 0.6b,# | −0.4 ± 0.6a,# | −0.4 ± 0.5a,b,# |
| IBW | −0.1 ± 0.2a,# | −0.04 ± 0.3a,# | −0.05 ± 0.3a,# |
| Lean (%) | |||
| ObN | 3.0 ± 1.3a,# | 6.7 ± 1.5c,$ | 11.3 ± 3.4c,$ |
| ObP | 0.5 ± 0.8a,# | 2.1 ± 2.1a,# | 2.4 ± 3.0a,# |
| WLD | 4.8 ± 2.0a,# | 10.7 ± 3.3c,$ | 16.2 ± 4.7c,$ |
| IBW | 4.2 ± 2.3b,# | 6.3 ± 4.2b,# | 4.9 ± 4.6b,# |
Numerical data presented as mean ± standard deviation.
ObN, obese nutraceutical group; ObP, obese placebo group; WLD, weight loss diet group; IBW, ideal body weight group.
Except where otherwise indicated, n = 5 for obesification groups (ObN, ObP, WLD) and n = 6 for group IBW.
WLD in this column determined from 4 dogs, because 1 dog reached ideal weight and ended treatment at 8 weeks.
Within a column, values with different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Across columns, values with different superscript symbols differ significantly (p < 0.05).