Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 25;10:1531. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01531

Table 1.

Main characteristics and results of the 22 studies included in the meta-analysis.

Article source EGFR situation Trial name Lines of therapy EGFR-TKI intervention Control treatment Total patients Median age (years) Median follow-up (months) Overall HR (95% CI) Sex of HR (95% CI) Smoking of HR (95% CI)
Male Female Never Ever
Thatcher et al. (15) Unknown ISEL >1 Gefitinib Placebo 1,692 62/61 7.2 0.89 (0.77–1.02) 0.91 (0.78-1.06) 0.77 (0.60-0.97) 0.67 (0.49-0.91) 0.92 (0.80-1.05)
Tsao et al. (16) Unknown BR.21 >1 Erlotinib Placebo 731 62/59 NR 0.70 (0.58–0.85) 0.76 (0.62–0.94) 0.80 (0.59–1.07) 0.42 (0.28–0.64) 0.87 (0.71–1.05)
Kim et al. (17) Unknown INTEREST >1 Gefitinib Docetaxel 1,433 61/60 7.6 1.02 (0.91–1.15) 1.08 (0.95–1.24) 0.95 (0.78–1.17) 0.93 (0.70–1.23) 1.05 (0.92–1.19)
Maruyama et al. (18) Unknown V-15-32 >1 Gefitinib Docetaxel 489 NR 21 1.12 (0.89–1.40) 1.10 (0.83–1.43) 1.23 (0.81–1.84) 0.93 (0.58–1.48) 1.13 (0.87–1.45)
Cappuzzo et al. (19) Unknown SATURN >1 Erlotinib Placebo 889 60/60 11.4/11.5 0.81 (0.70–0.95) 0.88 (0.74–1.05) 0.64 (0.46–0.91) 0.69 (0.45–1.05) 0.84 (0.71–0.99)
Fukuoka et al. (20) Unknown IPASS 1 Gefitinib Carboplatin plus paclitaxel 1,217 57/57 17 0.90 (0.79–1.02) 0.77 (0.59–1.02) 0.93 (0.81–1.08) 0.90 (0.78–1.03) 0.99 (0.62–1.60)
Lee et al. (21) Unknown TOPICAL 1 Erlotinib Placebo 670 77/77 NR 0.94 (0.81–1.10) Female vs. male
0.81 (0.59–1.01)
Never vs. ever
0.64 (0.36–1.14)
Pérol et al. (22) Unknown IFCT-GFPC
0502
>1 Erlotinib Observation 310 56.4/59.8 25.6 0.87 (0.68–1.13) 0.88 (0.66–1.18) 0.89 (0.52–1.53) 0.83 (0.34–2.01) 0.88 (0.68–1.15)
Kelly et al. (23) Wild-type PDX-012 >1 Erlotinib Pralatrexate 201 62/63 NR 1.19 (0.88–1.64) 1.08 (0.75–1.56) 1.64 (0.92–2.94) NR NR
Miller et al. (24) Unknown LUX-Lung 1 >1 Afatinib Placebo 585 58/59 NR 1.08 (0.86–1.35) 1.17 (0.83–1.65) 1.02 (0.76–1.37) 1.20 (0.90–1.61) 0.43 (0.31–0.61)
Ciuleanu et al. (25) Unknown TITAN >1 Erlotinib Docetaxel or pemetrexed 424 59/59 27.9/24.8 0.96 (0.78–1.19) 0.86 (0.67–1.10) 1.23 (0.78–1.94) 0.86 (0.49–1.51) 0.93 (0.78–1.11)
Garassino et al. (26) Wild-type TAILOR >1 Erlotinib Docetaxel 219 66/67 33 1.27 (0.95–1.69) 1.18 (0.84–1.67) 1.47 (0.84–2.56) 1.69 (0.89–3.23) 1.12 (0.81–1.54)
Inoue et al. (27) Mutation NEJ002 1 Gefitinib Carboplatin plus paclitaxel 228 NR 23 0.89 (0.63–1.24) 0.92 (0.53–1.61) 0.88 (0.57–1.35) 0.88 (0.57–1.37) 0.98 (0.58–1.65)
Ellis et al. (28) Unknown NCIC CTG
BR.26
>1 Dacomitinib Placebo 720 63.5/65.5 23.4/24.4 1.00 (0.83–1.21) NR NR 0.74 (0.56–0.98) 1.13 (0.91–1.40)
Gregorc et al. (29) Unknown PROSE >1 Erlotinib Pemetrexed or docetaxel 263 66/64 32.4 1.15 (0.83–1.59) Female vs. male
0.90 (0.64–1.27)
Never vs. ever
0.80 (0.51–1.27)
Li et al. (30) Wild-type NR >1 Erlotinib Pemetrexed 123 54.3/55.1 14.7 1.01 (0.66–1.54) 1.24 (0.73–2.11) 0.64 (0.31–1.33) 0.81 (0.34–1.90) 1.10 (0.68–1.80)
Karachaliou et al. (31) Unknown EURTAC 1 Erlotinib Cisplatin plus docetaxel or gemcitabine 97 NR 49.4 0.71 (0.45–1.12) Female vs. male 0.96 (0.59–1.56) NR NR
Zhou et al. (32) Mutation OPTIMAL 1 Erlotinib Gemcitabine plus carboplatin 154 57/59 25.9 1.19 (0.83–1.71) 1.31 (0.75–2.31) 1.20 (0.74–1.93) 1.44 (0.93–2.24) 0.85 (0.44–1.64)
Wu et al. (33) Mutation ENSURE 1 Erlotinib Gemcitabine plus cisplatin 217 57.5/56 28.9/27.1 0.91 (0.63–1.31) 0.86 (0.45–1.64) 0.92 (0.59–1.44) 0.99 (0.65–1.52) 0.68 (0.32–1.43)
Yang et al. (34) Mutation LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6 1 Afatinib Pemetrexed-cisplatin or gemcitabine-cisplatin 631 60/59 41/33 0.81 (0.66–0.99) 0.71 (0.51–0.99) 0.84 (0.65–1.09) 0.72 (0.57–0.92) 1.02 (0.69–1.50)
Zhao et al. (35) Unknown INFORM >1 Gefitinib Placebo 296 55/55 17.8 0.88 (0.68–1.14) 0.89 (0.64–1.24) 0.93 (0.61–1.41) 0.94 (0.65–1.35) 0.82 (0.57–1.19)
Shi et al. (36) Mutation CONVINCE 1 Icotinib Cisplatin plus pemetrexed 285 56 39.6 1.03 (0.76–1.39) 1.19 (0.69–2.04) 0.96 (0.67–1.39) 1.02 (0.72–1.45) 1.20 (0.64–2.27)

EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NR, none reported.