Table 9.

Comparison of some state-of-the-art study performances to detect arrhythmia.

Study	Num. of Subjects	Num. of Beats/Segments	Input type	Category	Method	Evaluation Scheme	Performance
Acharya et al. [4]	47	109,449	Single lead/ Beat	5 AAMI class	CNN	Intra-Patient	Acc: 94.03%
Xu et al. [5]	22	50,977	Single lead/ Beat	5 AAMI classes	DNN	Inter-Patient	Acc: 93.1%
Gao et al. [30]	-	93,371	Single lead/ Beat	8 Heartbeats	LSTM, FL	Intra-Patient	Acc: 99.26%
Hannun et al. [56]	53,549	91,232	Single lead/ Segment	12 Rhythm	CNN	Inter-Patient	F1: 0.83
Oh et al. [58]	47	83,648	Single lead/ Segment	5 Heartbeats	Modified U-net	Intra-Patient	Acc: 97.32%
Li et al. [59]	47	94,013	2-lead/ Beat	5 AAMI class	Deep ResNet	Intra-Patient	Acc: 99.38%
Yildirim et al. [60]	45	1,000	Single lead/ Segment	17 Rhythm	CNN	Intra-Patient	Acc: 91.33%
Shaker et al. [61]	44	102,098	Single lead/ Beat	15 class	CNN	Intra-Patient	Acc: 98.30%
Yildirim et al. [65]	-	7,326	Single lead/ Beat	5 Heartbeats	DBLSTM-WS	Intra-Patient	Acc: 99.39%
Chang et al. [66]	38,899	65,932	12 lead/ Segment	12 Rhythm	LSTM	Inter-Patient	Acc: 90%
Oh et al. [67]	47	16,499	Single lead/ Segment	5 Heartbeats	CNN-LSTM	Intra-Patient	Acc: 98.1%
Warric et al. [68]	-	8,528	Single lead/ Segment	4 Rhythm	CNN-LSTM	Intra-Patient	F1: 0.82
Xindog et al. [70]	-	12,186	Single lead/ Segment	4 Classes	CNN+RNN	Intra-Patient	F1: 0.82
Oh et al. [72]	170	150,268	Single lead/ Segment	3 Cardiac Disease	CNN-LSTM	Intra-Patient	Acc: 98.51%
Mousavi et al. [73]	-	750	Single lead/ Segment	5 Rhythm	CNN-attention-LSTM	Intra-Patient	Acc: 93.75%
Wu et al. [84]	-	8,528	Single lead/ Segment	4 Classes	Binarized CNN	Intra-Patient	F1: 0.86
Yao et al. [86]	-	6,877	12-lead/ Segment	8 Rhythm	ATI-CNN	Inter-Patient	F1: 0.81
Proposed	10,436	10,436	Single lead/ Segment	7 Rhythm	DNN	Inter-Patient	Acc: 92.24%
	10,588	10,588	Single lead/ Segment	4 Rhythm		Inter-Patient	Acc: 96.13%