Table 1.

Correlations (Top child/bottom parent)

																Parent	Child
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	M(SD)	M(SD)
Mon11 (1)	-	.56	.30	.22	.03	.08	.05	.07	−.06	.01	.05	.05	−.17	−.16	−.09	4.40(.62)	3.99(.70)
Mon12 (2)	.49	-	.43	.36	.10	.28	.16	.16	.04	.19	.20	.25	−.17	−.22	−.10	4.29(.67)	4.13(.74)
Mon15 (3)	.49	.50	-	.52	.04	.20	.12	.12	−.06	−.04	.05	.05	−.02	−.07	.00	4.02(.72)	4.03(.73)
Mon17 (4)	.42	.40	.50	-	−.01	.15	.14	.10	−.01	.01	.09	.07	.01	−.02	−.01	3.80(.95)	3.83(.94)
Coh11 (5)	.06	.17	.11	.15	-	.63	.46	.47	.63	.48	.37	.44	−.24	−.19	−.15	19.32(4.67)
Coh12 (6)	.09	.21	.20	.15	.63	-	.56	.48	.53	.69	.50	.48	−.36	−.40	−.28	18.96(4.70)
Coh15 (7)	.11	.08	.11	.10	.46	.56	-	.62	.38	.41	.72	.56	−.19	−.22	−.33	18.24(5.39)
Coh17 (8)	.06	.10	.18	.09	.47	.48	.62	-	.40	.39	.51	.71	−.19	−.20	−.26	18.34(4.96)
Cont11 (9)	.09	.07	.10	.08	.63	.53	.38	.40	-	.61	.40	.46	−.10	−.10	−.08	19.32(4.67)
Cont12 (10)	.12	.26	.10	.08	.48	.69	.41	.39	.61	-	.44	.53	−.21	−.24	−.20	18.96(4.70)
Cont15 (11)	.16	.07	.14	.06	.37	.50	.72	.51	.40	.44	-	.59	−.20	−.24	−.26	18.24(5.39)
Cont17 (12)	.10	.06	.08	.08	.44	.48	.56	.71	.46	.53	.59	-	−.20	−.20	−.27	18.34(4.96)
Disa11 (13)	−.06	−.11	−.12	−.12	−.24	−.36	−.19	−.19	−.10	−.21	−.20	−.20	-	.91	.70	0.12(.06)
Disa12 (14)	−.07	−.08	−.07	−.11	−.19	−.40	−.22	−.20	−.10	−.23	−.24	−.21	.91	-	.71	0.14(.05)
Disa15 (15)	.01	−.05	−.04	−.07	−.14	−.28	−.33	−.26	−.08	−.20	−.26	−.27	.71	.71	-	0.04(.05)

^aAll pairwise correlations with p values less than .05 are bolded

^bMon## = parental monitoring at ages 11, 12, 15 and 17

Coh## = perception of neighborhood cohesion at ages 11, 12, 15 and 17

Cont## = perceptions of neighborhood control at ages 11, 12, 15 and 17

Disa## = neighborhood disadvantage at ages 11, 12 and 15.