Table 2.
Adolescent quality and satisfaction ratings for the MICUNAY intervention.
| % of adolescents | |
|---|---|
| Quality | |
| How would rate the quality of the groups? | 85% |
| Satisfaction | |
| Generally, I am satisfied with the groups I attended. | 80% |
| Therapeutic alliance | |
| The group leader and I respected each other. | 80% |
| The group leader respected my background. | 86% |
| We worked together to set goals. | 62% |
| I feel that the things I did in the group will help me to make the changes that I want. | 73% |
| The group leader helped me believe that I could change and improve my life. | 80% |
| The group leader was helpful. | 84% |
| Session style | |
| The group leader respected where I was at with my AOD use and that any change was up to me. | 76% |
| The group leader valued my opinion. | 86% |
| I feel that the things I did in the group will help me to make the changers that I want. | 72% |
| I learned more about AI/AN culture. | 77% |
| The different activities that we did in group were helpful. | 75% |
| Participating in the MICUNAY cultural activities can help me lead a healthier life. | 73% |
Note:
a
For quality, percent reflects adolescents who reported “excellent” or “good”; for satisfaction, therapeutic alliance and session style, percent reflects those who reported “strongly agree” or “agree”.