Table 4.
Effect of MICUNAY on 3-month and 6-month outcomesa.
MICUNAY + CWG at 3 months | CWG at 3 months | MICUNAY + CWG at 6 months | CWG at 6 months | MICUNAY effectb | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Continuous outcomes | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Coefficient (SE) | p-Value | Effect sizea |
Intentions to drink any alcohol in next 6 months | 2.26 (1.27) | 2.22 (1.19) | 1.65 (0.96) | 1.84 (1.04) | 0.00 (0.12) | 0.99 | 0.00 |
Intentions to use any marijuana in next 6 months | 1.97 (1.21) | 2.02 (1.15) | 1.92 (1.15) | 2.03 (1.14) | −0.05 (0.13) | 0.71 | −0.04 |
Intentions to smoke a cigarette in next 6 months | 1.30 (0.71) | 1.30 (0.81) | 1.66 (1.14) | 1.77 (1.23) | −0.06 (0.11) | 0.59 | −0.06 |
Alcohol resistance self-efficacy | 2.82 (1.21) | 2.78 (1.15) | 2.95 (1.09) | 3.00 (1.06) | −0.01 (0.13) | 0.93 | −0.01 |
How often around teens smoking cigarettes | 1.52 (0.84) | 1.49 (0.96) | 1.54 (0.83) | 1.53 (0.93) | 0.07 (0.11) | 0.53 | 0.08 |
How often around teens drinking alcohol | 1.78 (0.95) | 1.77 (1.05) | 1.76 (0.99) | 1.76 (0.94) | 0.11 (0.12) | 0.36 | 0.11 |
How often around teens using marijuana | 2.42 (1.20) | 2.45 (1.29) | 2.04 (1.18) | 2.14 (1.18) | 0.09 (0.14) | 0.51 | 0.07 |
Intentions to participate in cultural activities in next 6 months | 2.14 (0.94) | 2.29 (1.00) | 2.68 (0.89) | 2.71 (0.96) | 0.03 (0.11) | 0.80 | 0.03 |
Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure (MEIM) | 3.38 (1.08) | 3.36 (1.04) | 3.39 (1.14) | 3.11 (1.13) | 0.16 (0.13) | 0.21 | 0.15 |
Spirituality/happiness | 3.41 (1.17) | 3.24 (1.18) | 3.29 (1.29) | 3.12 (1.24) | 0.13 (0.16) | 0.42 | 0.11 |
Dichotomous outcomes | % | % | % | % | Odds ratio (CI) | p-Value | Effect sizec |
Any consequences from drinking alcohol past 3 months | 35 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 1.15 (0.61–2.18) | 0.66 | 0.08 |
Any consequences from using marijuana past 3 months | 11 | 16 | 30 | 33 | 0.72 (0.35–1.48) | 0.37 | −0.18 |
Used tobacco in the past 3 months | 19 | 18 | 33 | 33 | 1.24 (0.57–2.70) | 0.59 | 0.12 |
Drank alcohol in the past 3 months | 46 | 44 | 29 | 31 | 1.17 (0.63–2.19) | 0.61 | 0.09 |
Had 5 or more drinks in a row in past 3 months | 32 | 29 | 24 | 25 | 1.01 (0.48–2.12) | 0.97 | 0.01 |
Used marijuana in the past 3 months | 36 | 40 | 28 | 31 | 1.02 (0.50–2.10) | 0.96 | 0.01 |
All results in table account for missing data using multiple imputation methods.
Follow-up outcomes at 3- and 6-months were analyzed together. Regression models include records for each of the two follow-ups per participant. Models account for clustering of responses within individual and adjust for baseline values of the outcome, race/ethnicity, age, gender, which survey (3-month or 6-month) the response came from, and time elapsed between the end of treatment and the follow-up survey response.
For continuous outcomes, effect size is the coefficient divided by the standard deviation of the outcome for combined follow-up data. For dichotomous outcomes, the effect size is the log of the odds ratio divided by 1.81.