Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 17;83(9):880–884. doi: 10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000385

Table 2.

Comparison of demographic data and clinic features between patients with POAG and PACG

POAG (n = 17)
N (%) or mean ± SD
PACG (n = 22)
N (%) or mean ± SD
p
Sex
 Male 13 (76.5%) 18 (81.8%) 0.71
Mean age (y) 78.4 ± 5.1 78.2 ± 4.2 1
BMI (kg/m2) 24.9 ± 5.4 24.6 ± 3.3 0.93
Baseline IOP (mmHg) 14.9 ± 3.1 14 ± 2.7 0.44
Post-mydriatic IOP (mmHg) 15.3 ± 4 15.3 ± 3.3 0.91
LogMAR BCVA 0.3 ± 0.2 0.4 ± 0.3 0.66
Spherical equivalence −0.1 ± 1.5 0.2 ± 2.2 0.19
Lens statusa
 Phakic 12 (70.6%) 19 (86.4%) 0.26
 Pseudophakic 5 (29.4%) 3 (13.6%)
Axial length (mm) 24.3 ± 1.4 23.2 ± 0.8 0.004*
Pachymetry (μm) 557.4 ± 27.7 557.6 ± 39 0.65
Vertical CDR 0.8 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.2 0.66
Horizontal CDR 0.8 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.2 0.37
Vertical diameter (μm) 1.9 ± 0.2 2.1 ± 0.3 0.03*
Disc hemorrhage 1 (5.9%) 0 (0%) 0.44

*p < 0.05.

BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; BMI = body mass index; CDR = cup-to-disc ratio; IOP = intraocular pressure; LogMAR = logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; PACG = primary angle-closure glaucoma; POAG = primary open-angle glaucoma.

aThe lens status was determined according to the eye with a more advanced disease if the two eyes of a patient were at different disease status.