Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care Res Rev. 2017 Nov 2;76(6):758–783. doi: 10.1177/1077558717739214

Table 13.

Association Between Changes in Clinical Staffing Expenditures and Changes in Staffing Scores: Fixed Effects Regressions (Sensitivity Analysis—Broader Measure of Clinical Staffing Expenditure).

Not-for-profit and low Medicaid Not-for-profit and high Medicaid For-profit and low Medicaid For-profit and high Medicaid

Post 2.17*** (0.59) −0.21 (0.61) 2.54*** (0.33) 0.38 (0.27)
Adjusted RN 6.81*** (2.24) 4.30** (2.16) 6.18*** (1.21) 8.05*** (0.92)
Adjusted LPN 2.64*** (0.90) 1.42* (0.85) 1.13** (0.48) 1.81*** (0.39)
Adjusted nurse aide 1.98*** (0.68) 1.67*** (0.60) 1.32*** (0.30) 1.12*** (0.29)
Post × Adjusted RN 1.38 (2.24) 0.59 (1.77) 0.67 (1.20) −3.39*** (0.97)
Post × Adjusted LPN −1.89** (0.83) 0.60 (0.91) −1.40*** (0.47) −0.49 (0.39)
Post × Adjusted nurse aide   0.59 (0.51)  0.050 (0.56)  −0.078 (0.28)  −0.28 (0.24)
Observations 4,426 3,160 12,302 14,514

Note. RN = registered nurse; LPN = licensed practical nurse. Facilities that have staffing scores and expenditures below 1st and above 99th percentiles are excluded from the sample. Results are obtained using facility and time fixed effects controlling for other covariates. Standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the facility level.

*

p < .1.

**

p < .05.

***

p < .01.